🔍 How This Helps in Scopus-Based Literature Review

Scopus Filters – You can directly extract Year, Source, Publisher, Country, Citations, and Keywords from Scopus metadata.
Comparative Analysis – Helps you see trends by year, most cited works, or country contributions.
Gap Identification – The Limitations/Gaps column forces critical review beyond summarization.
Relevance Tracking – The last column ensures you connect each paper to your research objectives.
Keyword Mapping – Useful for thematic clustering and bibliometric analysis later.

Doing a Literature Review using Scopus Database

A literature review is not just collecting papers; it is about analyzing, comparing, and identifying gaps in past studies to justify your own research. Scopus is a very useful database for this process.

🔎 Step 1: Define Your Research Topic

Write down your research question or theme (e.g., “Role of metro rail in sustainable urban transport”).
Identify keywords (e.g., metro rail, sustainability, public transport, pollution reduction).
Think of synonyms and variations (e.g., “urban transit,” “mass rapid transit,” “rail-based mobility”).

👉 Tip: Use Boolean operators in Scopus search:

AND = combine (e.g., metro rail AND sustainability)
OR = include synonyms (e.g., “metro rail” OR “mass rapid transit”)
NOT = exclude (e.g., “sustainability NOT rural”)

📥 Step 2: Search in Scopus

Go to Scopus.
Enter your keywords in the advanced search bar.
Use filters:
- Year (e.g., last 10 years)
- Document type (articles, reviews, conference papers)
- Subject area (engineering, social sciences, environmental studies).

👉 Export results (usually Scopus allows export to Excel, CSV, or RIS).

📊 Step 3: Collect Metadata

From Scopus you will get:

Title of paper
Author(s)
Year of publication
Journal/Conference name
Publisher
Country of affiliation
Abstract and keywords
Citation count

This is the raw data you will organize into a table.

📝 Step 4: Read and Summarize Papers

For each paper:

Skim abstract → to know aim, method, and findings.
Read methodology → note approach (survey, modeling, simulation, case study, review).
Check conclusions → note key results and limitations.
Note keywords → useful for thematic mapping.

📑 Step 5: Fill in the Review Table

Here is the detailed table for you:

S. No.	Title & Author(s)	Year	Source (Journal/Conf.)	Publisher	Country/Region	Research Objective / Aim	Methodology / Approach	Key Findings / Results	Limitations / Gaps	Keywords / Themes	Citations (from Scopus)	Relevance to Your Study
1	Sustainable Metro Rail and Urban Transport (Sharma et al.)	2021	Journal of Transport Policy	Elsevier	India	To examine metro’s role in sustainable mobility	Case study + survey	Metro reduced car usage by 25% in Delhi	Did not include suburban commuters	Metro rail, sustainability, public transport	45	Highly relevant
2	Urban Transit for Pollution Control (Lee & Park)	2019	Transport Research Part D	Elsevier	South Korea	To assess pollution control through transit policy	Econometric modeling	BRT improved air quality in Seoul	Only one city considered	Air quality, BRT, transport policy	90	Moderate relevance
3	…	…	…	…	…	…	…	…	…	…	…	…

📌 Step 6: Analyze and Synthesize

Once the table is filled:

Identify patterns: Which countries are leading? Which years had more research?
Compare methods: Are most using surveys, models, or simulations?
Spot gaps: Are rural areas, low-income cities, or gender aspects under-researched?
Build your argument: Show how your research will fill those gaps.

🧩 Step 7: Write the Literature Review

Use your table to structure the review:

Chronological approach → How studies evolved over years.
Thematic approach → Group by themes (e.g., sustainability, pollution, accessibility).
Methodological approach → Group by methods used (survey, simulation, case studies).

✅ By following these steps, a new student can move from “searching papers” to “analyzing literature critically” using Scopus.