Complete Life Table vs. Abridged Life Table

A life table is a demographic tool that provides a systematic description of mortality, survival, and expectation of life at different ages in a population. It is constructed using age-specific mortality rates and helps to estimate measures like life expectancy, survival probabilities, and death probabilities at each age or age interval. There are two main types: Complete Life Table and Abridged Life Table.


1. Complete Life Table

  • Definition: A complete life table shows mortality and survival data for every single year of age, starting from birth (age 0) up to the maximum attainable age (often 100+).
  • Structure: It has entries for each exact age (0, 1, 2, 3 … up to the last age group).
  • Detail level: Provides fine-grained detail about the probability of death (qₓ), number surviving (lₓ), and life expectancy (eₓ) at each exact age.
  • Advantage: Useful for very precise demographic and actuarial calculations such as insurance premiums, pension schemes, and health risk assessments.
  • Limitation: Requires detailed and reliable age-specific mortality data, which may not always be available, especially in developing countries.

Example:
If we construct a complete life table for India and at age 25, the table shows:

  • Out of 100,000 live births (l₀ = 100,000), about l₂₅ = 95,200 survive to exact age 25.
  • The probability of death between ages 25 and 26 (q₂₅) might be 0.0021 (i.e., 2.1 deaths per 1000).
  • Life expectancy at age 25 (e₂₅) could be 47.8 years.

2. Abridged Life Table

  • Definition: An abridged life table groups ages into wider intervals (commonly 5-year intervals such as 0–4, 5–9, 10–14, etc.) instead of providing values for each single year.
  • Structure: Usually constructed with 5-year or 10-year age intervals, though the first age interval (0–1, 1–4) is often broken into smaller parts due to higher infant mortality.
  • Detail level: Less detailed than a complete life table but easier to construct and interpret.
  • Advantage: Requires less detailed data, can be built with smaller population samples or incomplete mortality data. Suitable for census-based or survey-based population studies.
  • Limitation: Less precise because it averages mortality experience over age intervals.

Example:
In an abridged life table for India:

  • Age group 20–24 may show probability of dying (q₂₀–₂₄) as 0.008 (i.e., 8 deaths per 1000 over 5 years).
  • Life expectancy at exact age 20 (e₂₀) may be estimated as 51.5 years.
  • The table skips intermediate ages (21, 22, 23, 24), treating them as part of the group.

3. Key Differences at a Glance

AspectComplete Life TableAbridged Life Table
Age intervalsSingle year (0, 1, 2, …)Multi-year (often 5-year groups)
DetailVery detailed, preciseLess detailed, approximate
Data requirementNeeds full age-specific mortality dataCan be constructed from limited data
UseActuarial science, insurance, medical researchCensus analysis, demographic surveys, broad planning
Example outputProbability of death at exact age 25Probability of death for 20–24 as a group

Conclusion

  • A complete life table is more precise but data-intensive, best suited for actuarial and insurance purposes.
  • An abridged life table is more practical for countries or studies with limited demographic data, commonly used in population censuses and health surveys.
  • Both are crucial tools in demography, each serving different analytical and policy needs.