Planner or Big Data Scientist

By Shashikant Nishant Sharma

The debate over whether to refer to oneself as a “Planner” or a “Big Data Scientist” touches on the evolving nature of roles in data management, analytics, and decision-making. Each title implies a different focus, skill set, and approach to handling data and planning activities. To critically discuss this, let’s consider the distinctions and overlaps between the two roles.

1. Definitions and Roles

Planner: Traditionally, a planner is someone who devises strategies, coordinates activities, and allocates resources to achieve specific goals. This role is often seen in urban planning, business strategy, project management, and logistics. Planners focus on creating structured approaches to meet objectives, often relying on historical data, projections, and various planning tools.

Big Data Scientist: A Big Data Scientist, on the other hand, is someone specialized in handling, analyzing, and deriving insights from large volumes of complex data. This role involves using statistical methods, machine learning, and data mining to extract patterns, trends, and actionable insights from data. Big Data Scientists work extensively with structured and unstructured data, often using advanced computational techniques and software.

2. Skill Sets

Planners typically possess skills in project management, strategic thinking, resource allocation, and risk management. They may use data, but their focus is on the practical application of this data to achieve specific goals. Tools used by planners may include project management software, GIS (for urban planners), and various planning frameworks.

Big Data Scientists require strong analytical skills, proficiency in programming languages like Python or R, expertise in data analysis tools, and a deep understanding of statistical methods and machine learning algorithms. They must be able to work with large datasets, perform complex data manipulations, and create predictive models.

3. Approach to Data

Planners use data to support their planning processes but may not engage deeply with the data itself. Their focus is more on how to use available information to make strategic decisions. Data is one of many inputs into a broader decision-making process.

Big Data Scientists focus on the data itself. Their primary role is to uncover insights from data, which can then inform planning and decision-making processes. They are more concerned with the data’s quality, structure, and the methods used to analyze it.

4. Evolving Roles and Convergence

The line between planners and big data scientists is increasingly blurred. Modern planning often requires data-driven insights, and thus planners may need skills in data analysis. Conversely, Big Data Scientists might be involved in strategic planning based on the insights they generate. This convergence is seen in fields like smart city planning, where urban planners use big data analytics to understand traffic patterns, energy usage, and other urban dynamics.

5. Context and Industry Differences

In business contexts, a planner might focus on market strategies, supply chain logistics, or operational efficiency. A Big Data Scientist in the same company might analyze customer data, optimize product recommendations, or predict market trends. While both roles contribute to the company’s success, they do so in different ways.

In public policy or urban planning, a traditional planner might focus on land use, zoning, and community development. A Big Data Scientist could analyze social media data, census information, or transportation data to provide insights that shape these planning decisions.

6. Implications for Identity and Title

Choosing to call oneself a “Planner” or a “Big Data Scientist” reflects not only the skills one possesses but also the role one plays in the organization.

A Planner might emphasize their strategic, big-picture thinking, and their ability to integrate various inputs into a coherent plan. They may see their role as guiding an organization or community toward specific goals.

A Big Data Scientist might emphasize their technical skills, their ability to manage and analyze large datasets, and their role in uncovering hidden insights. They may see their role as providing the data-driven evidence needed to make informed decisions.

Conclusion

The choice between calling oneself a “Planner” or a “Big Data Scientist” ultimately depends on one’s primary focus and approach to their work. While there is overlap, the distinction lies in whether the individual is more focused on the strategic application of insights (Planner) or on the technical generation of those insights from data (Big Data Scientist). As roles continue to evolve with the integration of data science into various fields, professionals might increasingly identify with both roles, or new titles might emerge to capture this convergence.

References

Batty, M. (2013). Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialogues in human geography, 3(3), 274-279.

Hazen, B. T., Boone, C. A., Ezell, J. D., & Jones-Farmer, L. A. (2014). Data quality for data science, predictive analytics, and big data in supply chain management: An introduction to the problem and suggestions for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 154, 72-80.

Kayabay, K., Kılınç, A., Gökalp, M. O., Gökalp, E., & Daim, T. U. (2024). Technology Roadmapping: Data Science Roadmapping of Networked Organizations’ Strategic Planning for Artificial Intelligence. Future‐Oriented Technology Assessment: A Manager’s Guide with Case Applications, 273-300.

Sharma, S. N., Singh, D., & Dehalwar, K. Surrogate Safety Analysis-Leveraging Advanced Technologies for Safer Roads.

Shen, Z., & Li, M. (Eds.). (2017). Big Data Support of Urban Planning and Management: The Experience in China. Springer.

Steif, K. (2021). Public policy analytics: code and context for data science in government. CRC Press.

Van Der Aalst, W., & van der Aalst, W. (2016). Data science in action (pp. 3-23). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.