By Musthapeta Adithya

Ø ABSTRACT

Mortality indicators are essential tools for assessing the health status of populations and guiding public health interventions. This paper explores three critical metrics: Infant Mortality Rate (IMR), Neonatal Mortality Rate (NMR), and Adjusted and Standardized Death Rates. IMR and NMR reflect the quality of maternal and child healthcare, while standardized death rates allow for fair comparisons across populations with differing age structures. Using global and Indian data, this paper analyzes

trends, causes, and policy implications, highlighting the importance of these indicators in achieving Sustainable Development Goals and improving health equity.

Ø INTRODUCTION

Mortality statistics serve as a mirror to the health and development of societies. Among these, infant and neonatal mortality rates are sensitive indicators of maternal health, healthcare access, and socio-economic conditions. Meanwhile, adjusted and standardized death rates provide analytical clarity by accounting for demographic differences. This essay aims to define and compare these metrics, examine their trends globally and in India, and discuss their implications for public health planning.

Historically, high infant and neonatal mortality rates were common across the globe, especially before the advent of

modern medicine, sanitation, and vaccination. In the early 20th century, many countries reported IMRs exceeding 100 deaths per 1,000 live births. Today, thanks to advancements in healthcare and targeted public health programs, these rates have declined dramatically in most regions. However, disparities persist—both between and within countries—highlighting the need for

continued vigilance and investment.

In parallel, the use of adjusted and standardized death rates

has become essential in epidemiology and health planning. These metrics allow researchers and policymakers to compare mortality across populations with different age structures,

socioeconomic profiles, and risk exposures. Without adjustment, crude death rates can be misleading, especially in aging societies or regions with uneven demographic distributions.

This essay explores these three key mortality indicators—IMR, NMR, and standardized death rates—by defining their concepts, analysing global and Indian trends, identifying underlying causes,

and discussing their implications for public health policy. Through this comparative lens, we aim to understand how these metrics guide efforts toward achieving health equity, improving maternal and child outcomes, and meeting global targets such as the

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Ø DISCUSSION

1.     Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)

Definition

The Infant Mortality Rate is defined as the number of deaths of infants under one year of age per 1,000 live births in a given year. It is a widely used indicator of the overall health of a population,

reflecting the quality of maternal care, nutrition, sanitation, and access to medical services.

Causes of Infant Mortality

Infant mortality is influenced by a range of medical, social, and environmental factors:

• Preterm birth complications
  • Birth asphyxia
  • Neonatal infections (e.g., sepsis, pneumonia)
  • Congenital anomalies
  • Malnutrition and poor maternal health
  • Lack of access to skilled birth attendants

Global Trends

Globally, the IMR has declined significantly over the past few decades. According to the World Bank, the global IMR dropped from 65 per 1,000 live births in 1990 to around 25 in 2025. This progress is attributed to improved healthcare infrastructure, vaccination programs, and maternal education.

India’s Progress

India has made remarkable strides in reducing infant mortality:

• 1GG0: ~88 deaths per 1,000 live births
  • 2010: ~47 deaths
  • 2025: ~27 deaths

Government initiatives like the Janani Suraksha Yojana, Mission Indradhanush, and National Health Mission have played pivotal roles in this decline.

• Regional Disparities

Despite national progress, disparities persist:

States like Kerala and Tamil Nadu report IMRs below 10.

States like Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh still report rates above 40. Socioeconomic Correlates

IMR is closely linked to maternal education, household income, and urbanization.

Studies show that each additional year of maternal education can reduce IMR by up to 9%.

• Health System Factors

Availability of primary healthcare centers, emergency obstetric care, and trained birth attendants significantly lowers IMR.

Immunization coverage (e.g., DPT, measles) is a key determinant.

• Data Note

IMR is often used in Human Development Index (HDI)

calculations and is a key SDG 3.2 target: “End preventable deaths of newborns and children under 5 years of age.”

2.     Neonatal Mortality Rate (NMR)

Definition

The Neonatal Mortality Rate refers to the number of deaths of infants within the first 28 days of life per 1,000 live births. It is a subset of infant mortality and is often more sensitive to the quality of perinatal and immediate postnatal care.

Causes of Neonatal Deaths

• Prematurity and low birth weight
  • Birth trauma and asphyxia
  • Neonatal infections (e.g., sepsis, meningitis)
  • Congenital anomalies
  • Lack of skilled birth attendance

Global Scenario

• 2025 Global Average: ~17 deaths per 1,000 live births

• Sub-Saharan Africa: Highest rates, often exceeding 30
  • High-income countries: Rates below 3 India’s Neonatal Mortality

India has shown consistent improvement:

• 2010: ~32 per 1,000
  • 2020: ~22 per 1,000
  • 2025: ~17 per 1,000

Key Interventions

• Facility-based newborn care (FBNC)
  • Home-based newborn care (HBNC)
  • Kangaroo mother care (KMC)
  • LaQshya program: Improving labor room quality
  • Sick Newborn Care Units (SNCUs)

Urban-Rural Divide

• Urban areas benefit from better infrastructure and awareness.
  • Rural areas face challenges like poor transport, lack of skilled personnel, and cultural barriers.

Biological Vulnerability

• Neonates are biologically more vulnerable due to immature immune systems and thermoregulation.

• The first 24 hours are the most critical—up to 50% of neonatal deaths occur within this window.

Innovations in Care

• Point-of-care diagnostics, portable incubators, and telemedicine are improving neonatal outcomes in remote areas.
  • Essential Newborn Care (ENC) protocols are being scaled in India under the Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health (RMNCH+A) strategy.

Global Benchmarks

• Countries like Japan, Iceland, and Singapore have NMRs below 2 due to universal healthcare, high institutional delivery rates, and strong postnatal follow-up.

3.     Adjusted and Standardized Death Rates

Why Adjust Mortality Rates?

Crude death rates can be misleading when comparing

populations with different age structures. For instance, a country with an older population may naturally have a higher death rate, even if its healthcare system is effective. To address this, adjusted and standardized mortality rates are used.

Age-Adjusted Mortality Rate

• Definition: A mortality rate statistically modified to eliminate the effect of different age distributions in different populations.

• Purpose: Allows for fair comparisons across regions or time periods.
  • Method: Applies age-specific death rates to a standard population structure.

Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR)

• Definition: The ratio of observed deaths in a study population to the number of deaths expected based on a standard population.
  • Formula:
  • Interpretation:
  • SMR = 1: Mortality is as expected
  • SMR > 1: Higher-than-expected mortality
  • SMR < 1: Lower-than-expected mortality

Applications

• Public Health Surveillance: Identifying high-risk regions or groups
  • Occupational Health: Comparing mortality in exposed vs. unexposed workers
  • Policy Evaluation: Assessing the impact of health interventions

Example

Suppose a mining town reports 120 deaths in a year, while the expected number based on national age-specific rates is 100. The SMR would be:

This indicates a 20% higher mortality than expected, warranting further investigation.

Direct vs Indirect Standardization

• Direct method: Requires age-specific death rates in the study population.
  • Indirect method: Used when age-specific rates are unavailable; relies on a standard population’s rates.

Use in Epidemiology

• SMRs are widely used in occupational health studies (e.g., comparing factory workers to general population).
  • Also used in epidemic surveillance to detect excess mortality (e.g., during COVID-19 waves).

Policy Implication

• Adjusted rates help prioritize interventions in high-risk groups and evaluate program effectiveness over time.
  • They are essential for international comparisons, especially in WHO and OECD reports.

Cross-Cutting Themes

Digital Health C Data Systems

• India’s Health Management Information System (HMIS) and Civil Registration System (CRS) are improving mortality data accuracy.

• Aadhaar-linked health IDs and Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission aim to streamline maternal and child health

tracking.

Equity and Inclusion

• Marginalized groups (e.g., Scheduled Tribes, rural poor) often face higher mortality rates.
  • Gender disparities persist: female infants in some regions have higher mortality due to neglect and lower healthcare access.

Future Directions

• Artificial Intelligence and predictive analytics are being explored to identify at-risk pregnancies and optimize neonatal care.
  • Community-based interventions (e.g., Accredited Social Health Activists or ASHAs) remain vital in bridging last-mile gaps.

Ø CONCULSION

Infant and neonatal mortality rates are vital indicators of a

nation’s health infrastructure and maternal care. India’s progress in reducing these rates reflects successful policy interventions, though regional disparities remain. Adjusted and standardized death rates offer a refined lens for comparing mortality across populations, enabling targeted health planning. Together, these metrics guide efforts toward equitable healthcare and the

achievement of global health goals.

India’s progress in reducing infant and neonatal mortality over the past two decades is commendable. Targeted programs, improved institutional delivery rates, and community-based interventions have saved millions of lives. However, persistent disparities across states, rural-urban divides, and vulnerable populations underscore the need for sustained investment, innovation, and equity-focused policies.

Standardized and adjusted mortality rates, meanwhile, offer a critical lens for interpreting mortality data fairly. They allow policymakers to look beyond raw numbers and understand the

true burden of disease and death across different demographic profiles. In an era of aging populations, emerging diseases, and climate-related health risks, these tools are indispensable for evidence-based decision-making.

Looking ahead, the integration of digital health technologies, real- time data systems, and predictive analytics holds promise for further reducing preventable deaths. Yet, technology alone is not enough. Strengthening primary healthcare, empowering frontline

workers, and addressing social determinants of health—such as education, nutrition, and sanitation—remain foundational.

Ultimately, reducing mortality is not just a health goal—it is a moral imperative. Every infant saved, every mother supported, and every life extended reflects a society’s commitment to dignity, equity, and human development. As we strive toward the Sustainable Development Goals and universal health coverage, these mortality indicators will continue to guide our path,

reminding us that behind every number is a life that matters.

Ø REFERENCES

1. Adams, V. (2016). Metrics: What counts in global health. Duke University Press.
2. Bilheimer, L. T. (2010). Evaluating metrics to improve population health. Preventing Chronic Disease, 7(4), A69.
3. Gouda, H. N., Critchley, J., Powles, J., & Capewell, S. (2012). Why choice of metric matters in public health analyses: a case study of the attribution of credit for the decline in coronary heart disease mortality in the US and other populations. BMC public health, 12(1), 88.
4. Murray, C. J., & Frenk, J. (2008). Health metrics and evaluation: strengthening the science. The Lancet, 371(9619), 1191-1199.
5. World Bank Data on Infant and Neonatal Mortality
6. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), India
7. WHO Global Health Observatory
8. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India
9. UNICEF Reports on Child Mortality
10. Lashya and Janani Suraksha Yojana Program Documents
11. Wikipedia: Standardized Mortality Ratio
12. SlideShare: Rate Standardization Methods
13. Study Library  : SMR Calculation Examples