Mughal and British influences of India cities.

Urbanization in India owes much of its modern character to the Mughal and British periods. Both left distinct imprints on the physical layout, architecture, economy, and social fabric of Indian cities, though their approaches and motivations were very different.

Photo by Shantanu Goyal on Pexels.com

1. Mughal Influence on Indian Cities (16th–18th Century)

The Mughals, who ruled a large part of India between the 16th and 18th centuries, were great city-builders. Their urban vision reflected their Persian, Central Asian, and Indian cultural influences.

Key Features:

  • Imperial Capitals:
    • Agra: Established as the Mughal capital by Akbar, it became a center of governance, trade, and culture.
    • Fatehpur Sikri: Built by Akbar in the late 16th century as a planned city with palaces, mosques, gardens, and administrative quarters.
    • Shahjahanabad (Old Delhi): Founded by Shah Jahan in 1648, it was a grand capital with the Red Fort, Jama Masjid, Chandni Chowk (market street), and gardens.
  • City Planning:
    • Use of fortified walls and gateways for defense.
    • Charbagh (four-part gardens) symbolizing Persian influence.
    • Central market squares and bazaars like Chandni Chowk, which encouraged trade and cultural mingling.
    • Emphasis on aesthetics – symmetry, wide avenues, and monumental architecture.
  • Architecture and Urban Aesthetics:
    • Mughal cities blended Islamic, Persian, and Indian styles.
    • Landmark structures like forts, mosques, caravanserais (rest houses), and stepwells formed the urban landscape.
    • Red sandstone and marble became signature materials.
  • Economic Role:
    • Cities functioned as hubs of craft production, trade, and administration.
    • Delhi, Agra, and Lahore became cosmopolitan centers attracting artisans, traders, scholars, and travelers.

Lasting Impact:

Many Mughal cities like Delhi, Agra, and Lahore remain cultural and architectural icons. Their forts, gardens, and bazaars still shape the identity and heritage of these cities today.

2. British Influence on Indian Cities (18th–20th Century)

The British had very different urban priorities compared to the Mughals. Their cities were driven by administration, military strategy, trade, and segregation between colonizers and locals.

Key Features:

  • Presidency Towns:
    • Calcutta (Kolkata), Bombay (Mumbai), and Madras (Chennai) were the first major British cities, serving as centers of administration, trade, and ports for global commerce.
  • Dual City Pattern:
    • British cities had “White Towns” (European quarters with planned roads, bungalows, clubs, and churches) and “Black Towns” (densely populated Indian settlements with bazaars and narrow lanes).
    • This segregation reflected racial and social hierarchies.
  • City Planning and Architecture:
    • Introduction of grid patterns and planned layouts, especially in military cantonments.
    • Construction of civil lines, railway colonies, and cantonments with orderly streets and open spaces.
    • Use of neo-classical, gothic, and Indo-Saracenic architecture in public buildings like Victoria Memorial (Kolkata), Gateway of India (Mumbai), and High Courts.
  • Transport and Trade:
    • Expansion of railways, ports, and telegraph systems turned cities into commercial hubs.
    • Bombay became a textile hub, Calcutta a jute hub, and Madras a center for trade in cotton and spices.
  • New Capitals and Planned Cities:
    • The British shifted their capital from Calcutta to Delhi in 1911, leading to the creation of New Delhi (designed by Edwin Lutyens and Herbert Baker).
    • New Delhi was characterized by wide boulevards, administrative buildings (Rashtrapati Bhavan, India Gate), and radial planning, contrasting with the organic growth of Shahjahanabad nearby.

Lasting Impact:

  • India’s modern administrative and commercial cities owe much to the British.
  • The railway network stimulated the growth of industrial towns (e.g., Kanpur, Jamshedpur).
  • Colonial architecture and urban layouts continue to dominate central areas of cities like Delhi, Kolkata, Mumbai, and Chennai.

3. Comparison: Mughal vs. British Urban Influence

AspectMughal CitiesBritish Cities
PurposeImperial capitals, cultural centers, trade hubsAdministrative, military, and commercial bases
Planning StyleOrganic + symbolic (forts, gardens, bazaars, religious centers)Segregated, grid-like, functional (civil lines, cantonments, railway towns)
ArchitectureIndo-Islamic, Persian-inspired (Red Fort, Jama Masjid, Taj Mahal)Neo-classical, Gothic, Indo-Saracenic (Victoria Memorial, India Gate, CST Mumbai)
Social FabricCosmopolitan, relatively integrated markets and settlementsSegregated “White Town” and “Black Town” pattern
LegacyCultural heritage, tourism, living bazaarsAdministrative capitals, railways, colonial architecture, planned urban cores

4. Conclusion

Mughal and British urban influences represent two very different urban traditions in India. The Mughals emphasized imperial grandeur, cultural integration, and vibrant bazaars, while the British imposed segregation, order, and administrative functionality. Together, they have left a layered urban fabric in India, where Old Delhi coexists with New Delhi, Mughal Agra with colonial Cantonments, and bazaars with skyscrapers.