Call for Chapters in Springer Nature

๐Ÿ“ข Call for Chapters โ€“ Edited Volume by Springer Nature

Submission Open Now!

Title: Urbanisation and Waterscapes: Resilience and Sustainability in Urban Deltas

Editors: Dr. Kavita Dehalwar & SN Sharma

๐ŸŒ This edited book aims to explore how rapid urbanisation in deltaic regions interacts with water systems, governance structures, and socio-ecological resilience. It invites scholars, practitioners, and policymakers to contribute original research, case studies, and conceptual analyses that advance understanding of sustainable urban futures in water-rich yet vulnerable delta landscapes.

๐Ÿ“˜ Proposed Thematic Structure

Part I: Conceptual and Theoretical Foundations

Urbanisation, Water, and Deltaic Landscapes โ€“ A Conceptual Overview

Historical Perspectives on Urban Deltas and Waterscapes

Governance and Policy Frameworks for Urban Waterscapes

Part II: Pressures and Challenges of Urbanisation in Deltas

Climate Change, Sea-Level Rise, and Deltaic Vulnerability

Water Pollution, Waste Management, and Health in Urban Deltas

Land-Use Change and the Disappearing Urban Waterscape

Social Inequalities and Water Injustices in Urban Deltas

Part III: Case Studies from Global Urban Deltas

Ganges-Brahmaputra, Mekong, Nile, Rhine-Meuse-Scheldt, and Mississippi Deltas

Part IV: Towards Resilient and Sustainable Urban Deltas

Nature-Based Solutions

Smart Cities and Water Governance

Community-Led Resilience

Integrating Urban Planning and Water Security

๐Ÿ—“๏ธ Important Dates

Abstract Submission Deadline: 22th November 2025

Full Chapter Submission Deadline: 5th December 2025

๐Ÿ–‹๏ธ Submission Guidelines

Authors are invited to submit:

A 300โ€“400 word abstract outlining objectives, methods, and findings.

Author details (name, affiliation, contact email).

All submissions should align with the bookโ€™s central theme and contribute to scholarly and policy-oriented discourse on urban resilience, sustainability, and water-sensitive planning in delta regions.

๐Ÿ“ฉ Submit abstracts and chapters to: kdehalwar@manit.ac.in or research@track2training.com

๐Ÿ“˜ Title: Urbanisation and Waterscapes: Resilience and Sustainability in Urban Deltas

๐ŸŒ Publisher: Springer Nature

๐Ÿ–‹๏ธ Editors: Dr. Kavita Dehalwar & SN Sharma

Join us in shaping an interdisciplinary dialogue on resilient urban deltas and sustainable waterscapes!

Five Year Plans , Latest Attempts at Urbanisation Policy Formulation in the Country

By Anumula Pavan Santhosh

Indiaโ€™s five-year plans have played a central role in shaping urbanization and city policy since independence, with more recent years seeing major policy reforms, new missions, and a shift toward integrated, sustainable urban development. The governmentโ€™s latest attempts at urbanization policy formulation include comprehensive frameworks and transformative  schemes such as smart cities mission, AMRUT,PMAY, expanded metro systems, and innovative urban governance reforms.

ABSTRACT

Indiaโ€™s urban policy landscape is shaped by the legacy of Five-Year Plans and the recent shift to intregrated, mission-driven development frameworks. These strategies respond to complex realities housing shortages, infrastructure deficits, and social inequities-through participatory, evidence-based reforms. This essay traces the historical progression and the latest attempts at urbanization policy formulation, reviewing achievements, gaps, and contemporary solutions for resilient, equitable cites.

INTRODUCTION

Urbanization in India evolved gradually, influenced by the imperatives of economic modernization and demographic change. The Five-Year Plans laid the foundation, moving from limited urban intervention to systematic approaches in city planning, infrastructure upgrades, and governance. With cities recognized as engines of economic and social transformation, contemporary policies focus on technology, sustainability, and citizen participation to address the challenges and opportunities of rapid urban expansion

EVOLUTION THROUGH FIVE-YEAR PLANS

Early Five-Year Plan prioritized rural development, only marginally addressing urban issues like housing for refuges and basic amenities. The Third plan (1961-66) was pivotal, marking the first serious acknowledgment of urban challenges overcrowding, informal settlements, and inadequate infrastructure. Subsequent plans, decentralization, integrated development of smaller towns, and slum improvement.

The Tenth, Eleventh, and Twelfth Plans broadened their scope to encompass Sustainable cities, public transport, environmental protection, and public-private partnerships. The launch of Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) signaled a strategic shift, focusing on comprehensive urban infrastructure, basic services for the urban poor, and accountability of urban local bodies.

The Five Year Plans Era: Foundation of Planned Development (1950-2017)

Historical Context and Institutional Framework

Indiaโ€™s Five Year Plans system was established in 1950 with the formation of the Planning Commission under the chairmanship of Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. Drawing inspiration from the Soviet model of centralized planning, the Planning Commission became the architect of Indiaโ€™s post-independence economic strategy, formulating twelve comprehensive Five Year Plans between 1951 and 2017.

The Planning Commission functioned as an extra-constitutional body with sweeping powers over resource allocation and development planning. Its primary mandate included assessing national resources, formulating development plans, setting priorities, allocating funds to various sectors, and monitoring implementation across states and ministries. This centralized approach aimed to achieve balanced economic growth, reduce poverty, modernize key sectors, and promote social justice through systematic planning.

EVOLUTION THROUGH PLANS

The First Five Year Plan (1951-1956) prioritized agricultural development and infrastructure creation, successfully exceeding its growth target of 2.1% by achieving 3.6% GDP growth. Based on the Harrod-Domar model, it established crucial infrastructure including major dams like Bhakra Nangal and Hirakud.

The Second Plan (1956-1961) marked a shift toward industrialization, adopting the P.C. Mahalanobis model with emphasis on heavy industries. Despite falling short of its 4.5% growth target, it established foundational steel plants at Bhilai, Durgapur, and Rourkela.

Subsequent plans faced increasing challenges. The Third Plan (1961-1966) was disrupted by wars with China and Pakistan, while the Fourth and Fifth Plans grappled with inflation and political instability. The Sixth Plan (1980-1985) introduced the successful โ€œGaribi Hataoโ€ (Remove Poverty) program, while later plans increasingly emphasized liberalization and private sector participation.

The Twelfth Five Year Plan (2012-2017), the final plan, adopted the theme โ€œFaster, More Inclusive and Sustainable Growthโ€ with an 8% GDP growth target. It focused on poverty reduction, infrastructure development, and environmental sustainability while acknowledging the need for greater private sector involvement.

STRUCTURAL LIMITATIONS AND CRITICISM

By the early 2010s, the Five Year Plans approach faced mounting criticism for being incompatible with Indiaโ€™s liberalized economy. Key criticisms included excessive centralization undermining federalism, bureaucratic inefficiency, outdated rigid planning structures, lack of accountability in implementation, and disputes over discretionary resource allocation. The model of centralized planning was increasingly seen as unsuitable for a globalized economy requiring flexible, market-responsive policies

TRANSITION TO NITI AAYOG: PARADIGM SHIFT IN PLANNING APPROACH

Institutional Transformation (2014-2015)

In August 2014, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the abolition of the Planning Commission, citing the need for a more dynamic institution suited to contemporary economic challenges. On January 1, 2015, the National Institution for Transforming India (NITI Aayog) was established through a Union Cabinet resolution.

Unlike the Planning Commission, NITI Aayog functions as a policy think tank rather than a resource allocation body. It emphasizes cooperative and competitive federalism, involving states directly in policy formulation through its Governing Council comprising the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, and Lieutenant Governors. This represents a fundamental shift from top-down planning to bottom-up, collaborative governance.

New Planning Framework: Vision, Strategy, and Action Agenda

NITI Aayog introduced a three-tier planning framework replacing the rigid Five Year Plans. In 2017, it launched the Three Year Action Agenda (2017-2020), the first document in this new approach. This was designed to be part of a broader seven-year strategy and fifteen-year vision document, providing greater flexibility and responsiveness to changing economic conditions.

The Action Agenda emphasized ambitious yet achievable reforms across multiple sectors, including doubling farmersโ€™ incomes by 2022, reducing fiscal deficit to 3% of GDP by 2018-19, and promoting manufacturing sector growth to 10%. It represented a departure from the previous approach by focusing on policy changes and institutional reforms rather than just resource allocation.

Latest Attempts at Urbanization Policy Formulation

After the Planning Commission was replaced by NITI Aayog in 2015, urban policy took a mission-driven, actionable approach. Key recent initiatives and frameworks include:

โ€ข Smart Cities Mission: Launched in 2015, focuses on creating 100+ model cities that leverage technology for improved governance, sustainability, and quality of life. Smart infrastructure, ICT integration, and citizen-centric services define this policy

โ€ข AMRUT (Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation): Targets water supply, sewerage, green spaces, and urban mobility improvements in over 500 cities

โ€ข PMAY-Urban (Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana): Aims to provide affordable, secure housing. Over 1.16 crore homes sanctioned, making a significant impact on low-income urban families.

โ€ข Expanded Metro & Transit Networks: Unprecedented metro construction, with the network growing fourfold in a decade and new regional rapid transit projects, strengthens sustainable urban mobility.

โ€ข National Urban Policy Framework (NUPF): Outlines a coherent, integrated approach for future urban growth, focusing on governance, technology, participation, and inclusive planning.

โ€ข Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM), Heritage City Development (HRIDAY), National Urban Livelihoods Mission (NULM): These target sanitation, historic core revitalization, and urban poverty, respectively, signaling a broader, multi-sectoral urban policy approach.

RECENT POLICY INNOVATIONS AND INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS

Urban and Regional Development Plan Formulation Guidelines

The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs issued revised Urban and Regional Development Plan Formulation and Implementation Guidelines in 2022, updating the 1996 framework. These guidelines emphasize integrated planning, climate considerations, and stakeholder participation while promoting modern tools like GIS and remote sensing.

Technology Integration and Digital Governance

Recent urbanization policies emphasize technology integration through Integrated Command and Control Centers, smart metering solutions, IoT-based infrastructure management, and citizen service portals. The Digital India initiative supports urban governance through e-governance platforms and mobile applications for citizen services.

Financial Innovations and Urban Finance Reforms

Addressing urban finance constraints, recent policies promote innovative financing mechanisms including municipal bonds, land value capture, public-private partnerships, and green financing instruments. The framework encourages cities to become financially self-reliant through property tax reforms, user charges, and value capture financing.

FUTURE TRAJECTORY: VISION 2070 AND BEYOND

Indiaโ€™s urban future requires unprecedented coordination between policy formulation and implementation. With urban population expected to nearly double by 2050, the country needs to build over 144 million new homes and associated infrastructure. This represents both an enormous challenge and a critical opportunity to build climate-resilient, sustainable cities from the ground up.

The transition from Five Year Plans to NITI Aayogโ€™s framework, combined with comprehensive urbanization policy initiatives, reflects Indiaโ€™s adaptation to 21st-century governance challenges. However, success depends on effective implementation, adequate financing, institutional capacity building, and continued policy innovation to address the complex challenges of rapid urbanization while ensuring sustainable, inclusive development.

The evolution from centralized planning to collaborative federalism, coupled with recognition of cities as engines of economic growth, positions India to leverage urbanization for national development while addressing climate resilience and social inclusion challenges. The next decade will be critical in determining whether these policy frameworks can deliver on their ambitious promises of transforming Indiaโ€™s urban landscape.

ACHIEVEMENTS AND CHALLENGES

Achievements:

โ€ข Extensive growth in public transport infrastructure.

โ€ข Digitization of municipal services and improved local governance.

โ€ข Empowerment through housing, greenfield developments, and inclusive policy design.

โ€ข Robust community involvement and innovation in urban management.

Challenges:

โ€ข Infrastructure shortfalls and uneven development across regions.

โ€ข Persistent financial and human resource constraints in urban governance.

โ€ข Limited resilience to climate risks and social exclusion in fast-growing cities.

โ€ข Continued capacity gaps among urban planners and regulatory sluggishness.

CONCCLUSION

Indiaโ€™s urbanization journey reflects a shift from centralized Five-Year Plans to dynamic, integrated, and locally-driven policies. Landmark missions like Smart Cities and AMRUT, together with the NUPF, represent ambitious, forward-thinking approaches to city development. Future success will depend on strengthening urban governance, building local capacity, and embedding sustainability and inclusivity as core principles in all urban strategies

References

  1. Bansal, T. (n.d.). Five Years Urban Planning in India [Chapter]. In Urban Geography. Inflibnet e-books. Retrieved from https://ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in/geop09/chapter/five-years-urban-planning-in-india/ Ebooks Inflibnet
    Note: If a publication year is known for this chapter or the book, include it in place of โ€œn.d.โ€
  2. UrbanStudies Institute. (2024, May 20). How Indiaโ€™s Five-Year Plans shaped urban development. UrbanStudies Institute. Retrieved from https://urbanstudies.institute/introduction-to-urban-development/ Urban Studies
  3. National Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA). (2018). National Urban Policy Framework. SmartNet / NIUA. Retrieved from https://smartnet.niua.org/nupf Smartnet
  4. Doordarshan News. (n.d.). Transformative urban development initiative empower Indiaโ€™s middle class. DD News. (If possible, include a publication date).
  5. Press Information Bureau. (n.d.). Urban sector investments increase 16-fold, government expands efforts towards Vikshit Bharat by 2047. PIB. (If possible, include a publication date and URL).
  6. KPMG. (n.d.). Transforming cityscapes: Innovations driving smart cities and urban development in India. (Include a publication year if known).
  7. BYJUโ€™s. (n.d.). Urban planning and development in India. (Include retrieval date and URL).
  8. Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). Urbanization in India. In Wikipedia. Retrieved [Date], from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urbanization_in_India UN-Habitat
  9. Drishtias. (n.d.). Towards sustainable urbanization in India. (Include more bibliographic detail if available).
  10. Ministry of Panchayati Raj / mops.gov.in. (n.d.). Chapter 7: Five Year Plans. (Include full title, year, and retrieval URL if possible).

Introduction to Policies and Strategies for Directing Urbanisation Trends in India

By Pragyansh Sahu

 

ABSTRACT
India is undergoing a transformative urban shift, with projections indicating that nearly 50% of its population will reside in urban areas by 2047. This demographic transition presents both immense opportunities and formidable challenges. The need for coherent, inclusive, and sustainable urban policies has never been more urgent. This paper explores the evolution, framework, and implementation of urbanisation policies and strategies in India, with a focus on national-level initiatives such as the National Urban Policy Framework (NUPF), Smart Cities Mission, AMRUT, and the role of NITI Aayog in shaping urban discourse.

The discussion delves into the strategic pillars of urban governance, infrastructure development, housing, mobility, and environmental sustainability. It also critiques the gaps in policy execution, inter-governmental coordination, and citizen participation. Drawing from verified government sources and expert analyses, the paper highlights how Indiaโ€™s urbanisation trajectory can be steered toward equitable growth, economic productivity, and environmental resilience.

The conclusion underscores the importance of integrated planning, data-driven governance, and participatory frameworks to ensure that urbanisation becomes a catalyst for national development rather than a source of socio-spatial disparity.

INTRODUCTION
Urbanisation in India is not merely a demographic phenomenonโ€”it is a socio-economic transformation that redefines spatial, economic, and political landscapes. As per the 2011 Census, 31.2% of Indiaโ€™s population lived in urban areas. This figure is expected to rise to 50% by 2047, marking a pivotal shift in the countryโ€™s development paradigm.

Historically, Indiaโ€™s urban policies were reactive, focusing on managing urban poverty and slum rehabilitation. However, the 21st century has witnessed a strategic pivot toward proactive urban planning, infrastructure investment, and smart governance. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA), in collaboration with NITI Aayog and state governments, has launched several flagship programs aimed at transforming urban India.

This paper aims to:

Examine the key policies and frameworks guiding urbanisation in India.

Analyse the strategic intent behind these policies.

Evaluate their effectiveness in addressing urban challenges such as housing shortages, mobility bottlenecks, and environmental degradation.

discussion

1. Context why directing urbanisation matters now

India is urbanising rapidly: urban population and urban shares are rising year-on-year, and cities already generate a large share of national GDP while also concentrating social and environmental risks. Managing this shift well determines economic productivity, social inclusion, climate resilience and public health outcomes for hundreds of millions of people. Recent national programmes (Smart Cities Mission, AMRUT, PMAY and others) have scaled investment and institutional attention on urban transformation, making this an opportune moment to align policy direction with long-term, inclusive goals.

(World Bank Open Data)

2. Overview of Indiaโ€™s policy and programme architecture

Indiaโ€™s approach to urbanisation is multi-layered and programme-driven, combining national policies and centrally-sponsored missions implemented through states and urban local bodies (ULBs). Key elements:

National policy frameworks: National Urban Transport Policy (NUTP) sets principles for integrated land-use and transport planning; other frameworks cover urban housing, disaster resilience and liveability standards.

Changing Transport

Major missions and programmes:

Smart Cities Mission (2015) โ€” area-based renewal + pan-city technology solutions to improve service delivery and liveability in selected cities.

(Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs)

AMRUT (Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation) โ€” infrastructure provisioning (water, sewerage, drains, urban transport) for selected cities and towns.

Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs

PMAY (Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana โ€” Urban) โ€” aim to provide affordable housing for the urban poor through supply-side incentives and credit facilitation.

Sectoral policies: national urban transport policy, waste management rules, national urban sanitation targets, and state/City Master Plans.

Finance & governance mechanisms: formula grants, mission funding, incentivised performance-based transfers, special purpose vehicles (SPVs), publicโ€“private partnerships (PPP), and increasing focus on municipal finance reforms and property tax improvements.

Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs

These programmes have driven large investments but also raise coordination and equity challenges because they run in parallel across sectors and levels.

(NIUA)

3. Key challenges in directing urbanisation

Spatial fragmentation and informal expansion โ€” Urban growth often occurs through informal settlements at the peri-urban fringe with weak infrastructure and tenure insecurity.

Service delivery and infrastructure gaps โ€” Water, sanitation, drainage and public transport remain inadequate in many fast-growing towns. AMRUT/Smart Cities have made progress but unevenly.

Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs

Climate and environmental risk โ€” Unplanned expansion encroaches on wetlands and floodplains and increases heat-island effects; cities face increasing heatwaves, intense rainfall and flooding. Resilience must be mainstreamed into urban policy.

TIME

Transport and mobility โ€” Rising motorisation without integrated transport planning leads to congestion, pollution and inequitable access; the National Urban Transport Policy promotes walking, cycling and public transport but requires stronger implementation.

Changing Transport

Institutional capacity & governance โ€” Many ULBs lack technical capacity, modern planning tools, and predictable revenue bases. Coordination across ministries and with states is often weak.

Inclusion and affordable housing โ€” Despite PMAY, a large urban poor population remains vulnerable to eviction, informal rental market challenges and housing shortages.

(NIUA)

4. Strategic directions to guide urbanisation trends

Below are core policy strategies that should guide national, state and city actions to direct urbanisation toward sustainable, inclusive outcomes.

A. Plan compact, connected and mixed-use growth

Objective: limit sprawl, reduce travel distances and preserve ecological buffers.

Actions:

Update city master plans to enforce compact growth corridors, higher density nodes around transit, and mixed land uses.

Use zoning reforms and incentive mechanisms (e.g., transferable development rights, floor-area ratio (FAR) modulation) to concentrate growth where infrastructure exists.

B. Integrate land-use and transport planning

Objective: reduce motorised travel, congestion and emissions.

Actions:

Implement Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) around mass transit corridors.

Prioritise safe walking and cycling infrastructure and improve first-/last-mile connectivity.

Align road design standards and parking policies to discourage private vehicle overuse.

Changing Transport

C. Make urban infrastructure resilient and climate-smart

Objective: reduce vulnerability to floods, heatwaves and extreme events.

Actions:

Enforce ecological buffers (wetlands, floodplains) and green infrastructure โ€” permeable surfaces, urban trees, retention ponds.

Integrate climate risk assessments into DPRs and budget allocations for urban projects.

Promote building codes and heat action plans for cities in hot regions.

D. Prioritise affordable housing and secure tenure

Objective: reduce slums, guarantee basic amenities and protect livelihoods.

Actions:

Scale up in-situ upgrading of informal settlements with secure tenure, basic services and livelihood support.

Incentivise inclusionary zoning and cross-subsidy mechanisms in new developments.

Strengthen rental housing policy and tenant protections.

E. Strengthen municipal finance and governance

Objective: give ULBs predictable revenue and technical capacity.

Actions:

Reform property tax systems and adopt digital land records and municipal finance management systems.

Expand municipal bonds for creditworthy cities and blended finance instruments for smaller towns.

Build capacity via state urban missions, urban planning training partnerships (e.g., SPAs, state centers).

(The Times of India)

F. Leverage technology and data for planning and service delivery

Objective: improve efficiency, transparency and citizen engagement.

Actions:

Institutionalise city data platforms (GIS, asset registers, liveability indices) for evidence-based planning.

Use open dashboards for project tracking and participatory budgeting under Smart Cities / CITIIS initiatives.

(Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs)

G. Ensure inclusive governance and participation

Objective: bring residents โ€” especially women, informal workers and slum dwellers โ€” into decision making.

Actions:

Strengthen ward committees, neighbourhood planning forums and grievance redressal.

Mandate gender and social inclusion audits for projects.

5. Policy instruments & implementation tools

To operationalise the strategies above, policymakers can use a mix of regulatory, fiscal and programmatic instruments:

Regulatory tools: Updated building codes, zoning reforms, environmental impact assessments (EIA) for urban projects, coastal/floodplain protection laws.

Fiscal instruments: Performance-linked central/state grants, earmarked funds for green/low-carbon infrastructure, property tax reform, municipal bonds and PPP concessional finance.

Programmatic vehicles: Missions (Smart Cities, AMRUT, PMAY), state urban missions, city SPVs for project bundling, and capacity-building partnerships with academic institutions.

Innovative finance: Land value capture (LVC), development impact fees, urban climate funds and blended finance for resilience and low-carbon infrastructure.

Monitoring & evaluation: Liveability indices, third-party audits, and integrated project management units to ensure timely, transparent implementation and outcome measurement.

(Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs)

6. Cross-cutting policy priorities

These priorities must be mainstreamed across sectors:

Climate mitigation & adaptation โ€” All urban investments should screen for greenhouse gas impacts and resilience co-benefits.

Digital inclusion โ€” Technology must not widen inequality; ensure access for low-income groups.

Gender & social equity โ€” Design public spaces, transport and housing with specific provisions for women, elderly and differently-abled citizens.

Health integration โ€” Urban planning should integrate public health (sanitation, clean air, active mobility).

Ruralโ€“urban linkages โ€” Plan for peri-urban growth, agro-market linkages and intermediate town networks to reduce excessive magnetisation of mega-cities.

Conclusion

Indiaโ€™s urbanisation is inevitableโ€”but its direction is a matter of policy choice. The country stands at a critical juncture where it must balance growth with equity, innovation with inclusion, and development with sustainability. The National Urban Policy Framework, along with mission-mode programs like Smart Cities and AMRUT, provides a robust foundation. However, their success hinges on effective implementation, inter-agency coordination, and citizen engagement.

To truly harness the potential of urbanisation, India must:

  • Strengthen urban local bodies through fiscal and functional empowerment.
  • Invest in capacity building for planners and administrators.
  • Foster data ecosystems for real-time governance.
  • Promote climate-resilient infrastructure and green urbanism.

Urbanisation, if directed wisely, can be Indiaโ€™s greatest development lever. But if left unmanaged, it risks deepening inequality and environmental degradation. The path forward lies in strategic, inclusive, and adaptive urban governance.

References

  1. Bhagat, R. B., & Hassan, M. I. (2025).ย Urbanisation and Urban Policies in India. Springer Nature Singapore.
  2. Pucher, J., Peng, Z. R., Mittal, N., Zhu, Y., & Korattyswaroopam, N. (2007). Urban transport trends and policies in China and India: impacts of rapid economic growth.ย Transport reviews,ย 27(4), 379-410.
  3. Shukla, K., Mishra, S., Tripathy, S., & Singh, A. (2010). Urbanisation and migration trends in India.ย Demography India,ย 39(1).
  4. Nath, V. (1986). Urbanisation in India: Review and prospects.ย Economic and Political Weekly, 339-352.
  5. NITI Aayog โ€“ Managing Urbanisation
  6. Observer Research Foundation โ€“ National Urban Policies and the Government of Indiaโ€™s Role
  7. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) โ€“ Smart Cities Mission, AMRUT, PMAY-U official portals
  8. Census of India 2011 and projections by UN-Habitat and World Bank
  9. Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs โ€” Monthly reports and Smart Cities Mission resources.
  10. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs
  11. National Urban Transport Policy (2014) โ€” framework and guidance on integrated land-use and transport planning. Changing Transport
  12. World Bank / UN urbanisation datasets โ€” urban population shares and growth trends. World Bank Open Data

Urbanization in India: A brief History

By Akshit Das

Abstract

Urbanization in India embodies a progression shaped by colonial economic imperatives, post-Independence state-led development policies, and contemporary economic liberalization, resulting in a top-heavy urban system dominated by large cities with pronounced socio-economic inequalities and spatial disparities. Addressing these challenges requires nuanced urban planning and governance strategies that recognize historical legacies and contemporary dynamics of growth and migration.

Introduction

Urbanization has evolved as a dynamic process across different civilizations, reflecting the socio-economic, political, and cultural contexts of each period. Every era and society developed its distinct urban planning approaches to address the pressing challenges of its time. Recognizing these historical patterns is crucial for todayโ€™s urban planners, as it provides critical insights into how cities respond to changing human needs and environmental conditions. In the Indian context, urbanization exhibits a rich and diverse trajectory shaped by successive rulers, regional influences, and technological advancements. This essay, therefore, seeks to explore the evolution of urbanization in India through medieval to the modern period., highlighting key planning characteristics, spatial arrangements, and the enduring influence of past ideas and major events on the timeline of history such as the rise and fall of the Mughal Regime and the British Raj on contemporary urban development.

Discussion

First Urbanization

The Indus Valley Civilization (2350-1800 BCE) represents India’s first major urban phase, featuring remarkably advanced city planning. Cities like Harappa and Mohenjo-daro demonstrated sophisticated urban design with grid-pattern streets, advanced drainage systems, and clear zoning between upper and lower towns. These settlements included well-organized residential areas, granaries, public baths, and comprehensive sewerage networks that were far ahead of their time.

Second Urbanization

Following the Indus Valley period, India experienced what historians term the “second urbanization” during the early historic period (600 BCE – 300 CE), centered around the middle Gangetic plains. This phase witnessed the emergence of cities connected to regional kingdoms and expanding trade networks. However, the early medieval period (600-1300 CE) saw varied patterns of urban development, with some scholars arguing for urban decline while others identify new forms of temple-centered urbanization, particularly in South India.

The British Raj

Transformation and Urban Decline

The British colonial period initially brought significant urban decline to traditional Indian cities. This decline occurred for several interconnected reasons:โ€‹

Economic Disruption: The British showed little interest in India’s traditional industries, leading to the deterioration of established urban centers that had thrived under Mughal rule. The Industrial Revolution in England fundamentally altered India’s economic landscape, making many traditional crafts and industries uncompetitive.โ€‹

Trade Route Disruption: The introduction of railways dramatically redirected existing trade routes, disrupting the monopoly of traditional trading centers. Every railway station became an export point for its hinterland, depriving earlier trade centers of their economic foundations. This transformation was so significant that traditional centers in regions like Rajasthan experienced delayed decline only because railways reached them later, during World War I.

The Presidencies

The emergence of Calcutta, Bombay, and Madras as dominant metropolitan centers represents one of colonialism’s most significant urban transformations.โ€‹

Calcutta’s Colonial Development

Calcutta exemplified colonial urban planning principles. After Sirajudaula’s 1756 raid, the East India Company rebuilt Fort William and created the Maidan – a large open space around the fort for defensive purposes. The city developed a stark “White Town” and “Black Town” division, with British mansions around the Maidan contrasting sharply with crowded Indian neighborhoods in North Calcutta.โ€‹

Bombay’s Transformation

Originally comprising seven islands, Bombay was gradually connected and expanded to accommodate growing populations. As colonial India’s commercial capital, it developed significant industrial infrastructure while maintaining rigid spatial segregation between European areas like Malabar Hill and overcrowded Indian districts like Girgaum and Byculla.โ€‹

The Hill Stations

The establishment of over 80 hill stations between 1815 and 1870 created entirely new categories of urban settlements. These included major centers like Shimla, Darjeeling, Mussoorie, Nainital, Ooty, and Kodaikanal.โ€‹

British colonial-era buildings in Shimla hill station with distinctive architecture and greenery 

Multiple Functions: Hill stations served various colonial purposes – initially as sanatoriums for health recovery, later as horticultural centers for tea and coffee plantations (1840s), and finally as military cantonments and administrative centers after 1857. Shimla’s designation as summer capital in 1864 exemplified their growing political importance.โ€‹

Spatial Segregation: Hill stations functioned as “exclusive British preserves” where “the Indian [could be rendered] into an outsider”. They featured strict racial segregation, with original inhabitants like the Paharis, Lepchas, and Todas relegated to servant roles. These settlements recreated English village aesthetics through clock towers, bandstands, and Anglican churches, creating “home away from home” environments.โ€‹

A densely built colonial hill station town in India showing British-era architecture and forested hillsides typical of Shimla or Darjeeling 

Salient features of British Urban Settlements

Civil Lines and Cantonments: Institutionalized Segregation

The modification of existing cities through civil lines and cantonments created systematic spatial apartheid.โ€‹

Civil Lines: These residential areas housed British administrative officials, courts, and offices. Characterized by low-density development, broad tree-lined roads, and large bungalow compounds, they stood in stark contrast to overcrowded native quarters. The size of garden space around bungalows directly reflected hierarchical rank – senior officers enjoyed 15:1 garden-to-building ratios while junior ranks had 1:1 ratios.โ€‹

Cantonments: Military settlements followed grid patterns based on European urban planning principles. Originally mobile tent structures, they evolved into permanent suburban settlements designed to “promote aloof incorruptible government” while reinforcing “arrogant ideas of racial superiority”. These were connected to railway stations for troop mobility and supply logistics.โ€‹

The “Mall” served as the protected main thoroughfare in cantonments, contrasting with the “chowk” (central marketplace) of traditional Indian cities. While native city streets encouraged interaction, cantonment social life was restricted to exclusive clubs and gymkhanas.โ€‹

Railway-Driven Industrial Townships

Railways catalyzed the emergence of new industrial townships like Jamshedpur, Asansol, and Dhanbad. However, colonial railway development primarily served British economic interests rather than Indian industrialization.โ€‹

Limited Industrial Development: Despite massive railway construction, only 700 locomotives were manufactured in India between 1865 and 1941, while 12,000 were imported. This pattern reflected the colonial economy’s role as raw material supplier rather than manufacturing center.โ€‹

Employment and Urban Growth: Railways employed approximately 800,000 people by 1931, with major workshop complexes like Jamalpur employing over 11,000 workers. Railway colonies housed European employees in superior conditions, perpetuating racial hierarchies even in new industrial centers.โ€‹

Architectural details and colonial features of Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus (Victoria Terminus) in Bombay, showcasing British-Indian railway station design and urban colonial influence 

Infrastructure Inequality and Urban Apartheid

Colonial infrastructure improvements were deliberately unequal, reinforcing social segregation.โ€‹

Selective Modernization: Piped water supply, sewerage systems, street lighting, and domestic electrification were “restricted to civil lines and cantonment areas”. Most cities, particularly Indian residential areas, remained deprived of these facilities. Even municipal bodies established in 1881 served primarily areas with British populations.โ€‹

Health and Sanitation Divide: Colonial authorities justified demolishing Indian neighborhoods (bustis) on health grounds, forcing workers, craftsmen, and the unemployed to relocate repeatedly. Building regulations mandated tiled roofs over traditional thatch, creating additional economic burdens for Indian residents. This reinforced the racial division between “healthy” European areas and “unhealthy” Indian districts.โ€‹

Water Management Disruption: British water policies, influenced by Britain’s abundant rainfall patterns, neglected India’s traditional rainwater harvesting systems. The shift toward large-scale canal irrigation and centralized control disrupted community-based water management practices that had sustained settlements for centuries.

Post Independence

The post-Independence period (post-1947) marks a new phase of urbanization, characterized by rapid expansion and a marked increase in the number of towns and large cities, including the emergence of numerous one-lakh and million-plus urban agglomerations. This period saw significant refugee influxes, planned administrative centers such as Chandigarh and Bhubaneswar, and the development of new industrial cities. Urban growth increasingly concentrated in metropolitan and Class I cities, leading to pronounced urban primacy and regional disparities. While economic growth, particularly from the 1990s onward, has accelerated urbanization, it has also led to the informalization of the urban economy and proliferation of slums, highlighting socio-economic vulnerabilities.

Indiaโ€™s urbanization trajectory exhibits notable unevenness, with developed states experiencing concentrated urban growth and backward regions witnessing stagnation or decline in smaller towns. This dichotomy reflects broader patterns of economic development, infrastructural investment, and migration dynamics, where urban areas in developed states benefit from more robust economic bases and governance structures. Simultaneously, smaller towns in less developed regions struggle with maintaining their urban status and population. The colonial legacy continues to influence this urban dualism, with metropolitan centers dominating economic and demographic growth while peripheral areas lag behind.

Conclusion

The process of urbanization in India represents a complex and multifaceted transformation deeply rooted in historical, economic, and socio-political contexts, marked by distinct phases from the colonial era to the post-Independence period. Urbanization, understood as the progressive concentration of population in urban units, manifests through diverse interpretationsโ€”behavioral, structural, demographic, and geographicalโ€”reflecting changes in societal conditions and relationships.

References

Kanneboina, B., Singh, J. (2022), Urban Planning and Architecture of Indus Cities: Exploring the Layout and Infrastructure of Harappan Settlements, International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT), Volume 2, Issue 1 [Accessed on 12 October 2025]

Adukia, A., et al. (2022), Residential Segregation and Unequal Access to Local Public Services in India: Evidence from 1.5m Neighborhoods, 17th Annual Conference on Economic Growth and Development December 19-21, 2022 Indian Statistical Institute, New Delhi [Accessed on 12 October 2025]

Sharma, P. & Joshi, A. & Choudhary, R. & Tiwari, H. (2024). Water Management in India: from Ancient Communityโ€“based Systems to Colonial Interventions and Modern Strategies. [Accessed on 12 October 2025]

Sarmaya Arts Foundation [https://sarmaya.in/] Summer Holidays: The origin of Indiaโ€™s hill-stations (https://sarmaya.in/spotlight/summer-holidays-the-origin-of-indias-hill-stations/) [Accessed on 12 October 2025]

The Journey from Villages to Mega Cities: An Overview of World Urbanization

By Bhupendra Yadav

Abstract

Urbanisation is one of the most transformative processes shaping the modern world. Over the past two centuries, the global population has increasingly concentrated in cities, driven by industrialisation, economic opportunity, and social change. In 1950, only about 30% of the worldโ€™s population lived in urban areas; today, more than 55% do, and this figure is expected to rise to nearly 70% by 2050. This essay provides an overview of world urbanisation, examining its historical evolution, regional patterns, and socio-economic impacts. It explores how developed nations experienced early, industrial-led urban growth, while developing countries are witnessing rapid, often unplanned urban expansion. The paper also discusses challenges such as overcrowding, housing shortages, pollution, and inequality, alongside emerging trends like smart cities and sustainable urban planning. Understanding global urbanisation is crucial for addressing the complex issues of modern urban life and ensuring a more balanced and inclusive urban future.

The Journey from Villages to Mega Cities: An Overview of World Urbanization

For much of human history, most people lived in small, rural communities surrounded by fields, forests, and rivers. Villages filled with familiar faces and family ties were the backbone of civilization. It wasn’t until the last few centuries that humanity began to gather in citiesโ€”and this shift, known as urbanization, has utterly transformed how people live, work, and dream.

Early Beginnings: The Village World

Go back a few centuries, and the concept of a โ€œcityโ€ existed for only a tiny fraction of humankind. Around 1500, perhaps as little as 4% of the worldโ€™s population inhabited urban settlements. For the majority, the rhythm of life was dictated by the seasons, crops, and local traditions. Daily existence was deeply localizedโ€”what happened in a nearby field or a neighboring house mattered far more than distant events.

Of course, there were exceptional placesโ€”Beijing with its imperial grandeur, Istanbul at the crossroads of empires, Tenochtitlan dazzling in the heart of present-day Mexico. These cities were magnets for power, culture, and innovation, but they were still rare jewels in a vast countryside. Most European towns were modest in size, often only a few thousand residents, and urban life in Africa, Asia, and the Americas was just as diverse, shaped by environmental, political, and economic factors.

Seeds of Change: 1500 to 1800

The seeds of change began to sprout as new technologies, expanding trade networks, and the global reach of colonial powers took root. The Renaissance sparked a drive for knowledge and innovation in European cities, and explorers ventured forth to map new continents, often founding cities along the way. Colonialism led to the growth of trading posts and garrison towns from Africa to the Americas and Asia. These urban centers echoed the architecture, laws, and ambitions of their founding countries, but they also evolved over time, becoming melting pots of people and ideas.

During these centuries, city populations slowly increased as trade and administration drew people in from rural areas. Yet, most families remained tied to the land. The majority of people sustained themselves through agricultureโ€”food production was truly the lifeblood of society.

The Fire of Industry: 1800 to 1900

Everything changed with the birth of the Industrial Revolution. Suddenly, machines powered by coal and steam could produce goods faster and more efficiently than ever before. Factories, railroads, and mines appeared on the landscape, beckoning millions to abandon slow, uncertain rural life for the ceaseless possibilities of the city.

In this era, cities grew both outward and upward. In England, cities like Manchester and Birmingham exploded in size, while London became the world’s first true megacity. The population density became both a blessing and a curseโ€”urban centers became bustling hubs of commerce, energy, and creativity, but also crowded spaces plagued by poor sanitation, pollution, and inequality.

By 1900, the world had several hundred cities with populations above 100,000โ€”an astronomical increase from just a handful in previous centuries. This trend was mirrored in North America, where places like New York, Chicago, and Toronto became symbols of urban aspiration.

The Twentieth Century: Cities for the Multitudes

The 20th century was an era of sheer acceleration. Wars, revolutions, migrations, and technology fuelled an unprecedented wave of urban growth. Cities ceased being merely centers of power or culture; they became home to millions.

By mid-century, urbanization was no longer confined to Europe and North America. Asian, African, and South American cities began expanding rapidly. Sรฃo Paulo, Mexico City, and Cairo joined the ranks of global urban giants, while in Asia, Beijing, Mumbai, and Shanghai began their transformation into the sprawling megacities of today.

Government policies, economic opportunities, and technological advances made rural-to-urban migration easier and sometimes required. Infrastructure (roads, trains, electricity), healthcare, and education were more accessible in cities, further motivating the switch.

By 2007, for the first time in history, more people lived in cities than in the countryside. Now, over half the world’s population inhabits urban areas, and in some wealthier regions (Western Europe, America, Australia, and Japan), the share is above 80%.

What Drives Urbanization?

Urbanization happens for many reasons. At its core, it’s often about hopeโ€”a better job, improved education, safer healthcare, and a more varied lifestyle. Sometimes, it is driven by necessity, such as environmental change, war, or the decay of rural economies.

Modern urban expansion is deeply linked to economic growth. As societies develop, more people are pulled into service industries, manufacturing, and administrative work, which traditionally cluster in urban settings. The global movement from farming toward other forms of work means cities become centers of opportunity. The connection between income and urban living is strong; richer countries nearly always have more urban populations.

But thereโ€™s a tensionโ€”cities can be places of creativity and innovation, or they can be centers of stark inequality and hardship. Many cities offer higher standards of living, better public services, and vibrant cultural scenes, but they also host crowded slums and suffer from pollution, traffic, and insufficient housing.โ€‹

The Challenges of Urban Life

Cities are, by design, dense concentrations of resources, people, and ambition. The upside is clear: jobs, education, hospitals, and entertainment are often a short commute away. But these benefits can mask deep challenges.

Globally, almost 1 in 4 urban residents live in slums or informal settlements, lacking clean water, reliable sanitation, or safe and durable housing. The situation is worse in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, where rapid urban growth has outstripped the capacity of governments and markets to provide basic services.

Large urban agglomerations can also be deeply unequal. In some cities, immense wealth is found just blocks away from extreme poverty. Managing these contradictions is one of the great challenges of the 21st century.

Urban Growth and Environmental Impact

As cities expand, so do their environmental footprints. Urban areas consume vast amounts of resourcesโ€”energy, food, waterโ€”and generate significant waste and pollution. The worldโ€™s largest cities are responsible for a disproportionate share of greenhouse gas emissions.

But cities also offer some of the best opportunities for sustainable living. High population densities mean infrastructure like mass transit, water treatment, and energy distribution can be more efficient. Innovative architecture, green spaces, and public policies help mitigate ecological impacts, though much work remains to be done to make urban living truly sustainable.

Definitions: The Numbers Game

Talking about urbanization means grappling with definitions. Is a settlement of 5,000 residents urban, or must it have 50,000? Should population density or economic activity be the standard? Some countries count any city above 2,000 as urban; others set the bar at 50,000. These differences make international comparisons tricky; reliable data is difficult to come by, and estimates sometimes vary dramatically depending on definitions.

To address these challenges, organizations like the United Nations and the European Commission have proposed harmonized classifications, such as the โ€œDegree of Urbanization,โ€ which considers both population and density for consistent international statistics. Still, debates continue about where to draw the line.

Urbanization Patterns: Not All Cities Are Alike

There are many kinds of cities, shaped by geography, politics, and history. Some countriesโ€”like Singapore or Monacoโ€”are almost entirely urban. Others, such as Ethiopia or Nepal, remain overwhelmingly rural, with cities that are still growing, sometimes in fits and starts.

Some nations see much of their urban population concentrated in a single city. In places like Mongolia, Paraguay, or Liberia, half or more of urban dwellers live in the capital. In contrast, countries like Germany or Japan have urban populations spread across many cities, resulting in less centralization and often more equitable distribution of resources.

Globally, cities like Tokyo, Jakarta, Delhi, and Dhaka have transformed into megacities, each housing tens of millions. The infrastructure and planning required for such vast urban populations push the limits of innovation and governance.

Living Standards and Inequality

On average, urban populations have higher living standards than rural ones. Electricity, clean water, and modern sanitation are more common in cities; access to healthcare and education improves as well. Urban areas also tend to be more resilient to economic shocks or climate impacts due to their diversified economies and more extensive networks.

However, these averages can hide dramatic inequality. Many city residentsโ€”especially those in slum settlementsโ€”live in precarious conditions, sometimes without secure tenure or reliable public services. The battle to make cities โ€œinclusive, safe, resilient and sustainableโ€ is ongoing.

The Future of Urbanization

Looking ahead, urbanization will only intensify. By 2050, more than two-thirds of humanity is projected to live in cities. Country-level projections suggest nearly every part of the globe will complete the transition from rural to urban dominance, although the pace varies. India, now poised to become the worldโ€™s most populous nation, still has only slightly more than half its population living in cities; this is expected to grow substantially in coming decades.ourworldindataโ€‹

This global trend raises urgent questions about planning, sustainability, equity, and governance. The battle to build cities that are inclusive and efficientโ€”and that respect both human dignity and environmental limitsโ€”will define the 21st century.

The Human Story: Why Cities Matter

Why do cities matter? Because they tell the story of human connection, aspiration, and challenge. In cities, people rub shoulders with strangers, forge new relationships, collaborate, and compete. Cities pulse with life: the sound of markets, music in the streets, the rush of commuters, and the hum of factories and offices.

Cities have always been places of risk and reward. They foster innovation in business, science, politics, and the artsโ€”but also host social tensions and sometimes violence. Throughout history, cities shaped the destinies of nations, acting as crucibles for ideas and agents of change.

The best cities do more than collect people; they inspire them. They create spaces for art, science, and public debateโ€”arenas where the future is imagined and sometimes realized.

Toward the Next Urban Century

The history of urbanization is not merely a story of numbers and buildings. It is a testament to human adaptability, resilience, and the search for meaning beyond mere survival. As the world becomes still more urban, the challenges ahead demand new thinkingโ€”about inclusion, fairness, ecological limits, and what it truly means to thrive as a community.

If cities can balance humanityโ€™s ambitions with its need for dignity and connection, they can continue to be engines of progress, hope, and creativity. The future of urbanization is an unfinished story, one in which every generation contributes a new chapterโ€”one building, one neighborhood, and one dream at a time .


References

  1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2022 Revision. New York: United Nations, 2022.
  2. World Bank. Urban Development Overview. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2023.
  3. UN-Habitat. World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities. Nairobi: UN-Habitat, 2022.
  4. Davis, Mike. Planet of Slums. London: Verso, 2006.
  5. Satterthwaite, David. โ€œThe Transition to a Predominantly Urban World and Its Underpinnings.โ€ Human Settlements Discussion Paper Series, International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), 2007.
  6. United Nations. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023. New York: United Nations, 2023.
  7. World Economic Forum. Global Future Council on Cities and Urbanization: Shaping the Future of Urban Development. Geneva: WEF, 2021.
  8. Knox, Paul L., and Linda McCarthy. Urbanization: An Introduction to Urban Geography. 4th ed. Pearson Education, 2020.
  9. Seto, Karen C., et al. โ€œGlobal Urban Land Expansion, 1980โ€“2000.โ€ Environmental Research Letters 6, no. 3 (2011): 034009.
  10. Glaeser, Edward. Triumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier. New York: Penguin Press, 2011.
  11. OECD. The Governance of Land Use in OECD Countries: Policy Analysis and Recommendations. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017.
  12. McGranahan, Gordon, and Deborah Balk. โ€œUrban Transitions and the Spatial Displacement of Environmental Burdens.โ€ Urban Studies 49, no. 12 (2012): 2317โ€“2334.

Chronological History of Urbanisation in India

By Shashikant Nishant Sharma

1. Ancient Urbanisation (c. 2600 BCE โ€“ 1500 BCE) โ€“ The Indus Valley Civilisation

  • Major cities: Harappa, Mohenjo-Daro, Dholavira, Lothal, Kalibangan, Rakhigarhi.
  • Urban characteristics:
    • Planned cities with grid layouts, drainage systems, standardized baked brick construction.
    • Citadel and lower town division for administrative, residential, and commercial purposes.
    • Specialized craft zones, granaries, dockyards (Lothal), and markets.
  • Economic base: Agriculture (wheat, barley, cotton), trade (Mesopotamia links), and handicrafts.
  • Significance: Among the worldโ€™s earliest examples of planned urban settlements and public infrastructure.
  • Decline: Around 1500 BCE due to climatic shifts, river changes, decline in trade, and possible socio-political disruptions.

2. Early Historic Urbanisation (c. 600 BCE โ€“ 200 CE) โ€“ Second Urbanisation

  • Context: Post-Vedic period saw the emergence of the Mahajanapadas.
  • Cities: Pataliputra, Rajgir, Taxila, Ujjain, Varanasi, Kaushambi, Mathura.
  • Characteristics:
    • Fortified cities, administrative centres, trade hubs.
    • Growth supported by iron technology (tools, weapons) and agricultural surplus.
    • Rise of guilds (shrenis) and long-distance trade networks (Silk Route, Indian Ocean trade).
  • Political developments:
    • Mauryan Empire (321โ€“185 BCE) under Ashoka expanded urban networks, built roads, rest houses, and irrigation.
    • Indo-Greek, Shaka, Kushana rulers encouraged cosmopolitan cities like Mathura and Taxila.

3. Classical & Early Medieval Urbanisation (c. 200 CE โ€“ 1200 CE)

  • Gupta Period (c. 320โ€“550 CE):
    • Urban growth around administrative, religious, and trade centres.
    • Cities like Pataliputra, Ujjain, Prayag, and Kanchipuram flourished.
    • Decline after 6th century due to political fragmentation and ruralisation in parts of North India.
  • South Indian Urban Centres:
    • Chola, Chera, and Pandya kingdoms developed port cities like Kaveripattinam, Nagapattinam, and Muziris.
    • Maritime trade with Southeast Asia, China, and the Middle East.
  • Temple Cities:
    • Urban growth linked to large temple complexes (e.g., Thanjavur, Madurai, Bhubaneswar).
    • Served as cultural, economic, and administrative hubs.

4. Medieval Urbanisation (c. 1200 โ€“ 1757 CE)

  • Delhi Sultanate (1206โ€“1526 CE):
    • Establishment of Islamic urban forms โ€“ forts, mosques, madrasas, caravanserais, markets (bazaars).
    • Cities like Delhi, Agra, Jaunpur, Bidar, Gulbarga grew as political capitals.
  • Mughal Period (1526โ€“1707 CE):
    • Peak of pre-colonial urbanisation.
    • Major cities: Agra, Delhi, Lahore, Fatehpur Sikri, Ahmedabad.
    • Characterised by planned gardens (charbagh), monumental architecture, and bustling markets.
    • Growth of craft-based urban economies โ€“ textiles, metalwork, jewellery.
  • Regional Kingdoms:
    • Urbanisation in Deccan Sultanates (Bijapur, Golconda) and Rajput states (Jaipur, Udaipur).
    • Flourishing port towns on western and eastern coasts (Surat, Masulipatnam, Hooghly).

5. Colonial Urbanisation (1757 โ€“ 1947)

  • Early British Period:
    • Three Presidency towns โ€“ Calcutta, Bombay, Madras โ€“ became administrative and trade hubs.
    • Colonial urban planning focused on segregation: โ€œWhite Townโ€ for Europeans and โ€œBlack Townโ€ for Indians.
  • Industrialisation:
    • Growth of industrial cities (Jamshedpur for steel, Kanpur for leather, Ahmedabad for textiles).
    • Railway expansion linked inland towns to ports.
  • Urban Infrastructure:
    • Introduction of modern municipal governance, sanitation systems, and public institutions.
    • Port cities like Karachi, Vishakhapatnam, and Cochin modernised for trade.
  • Impact:
    • Colonial policies prioritised extraction and trade over indigenous urban development.
    • Many old towns declined as trade routes shifted to British-controlled ports.

6. Post-Independence Urbanisation (1947 โ€“ 1991)

  • Planned Capital Cities:
    • Chandigarh (1953) as a modernist planned city by Le Corbusier.
    • Expansion of New Delhi, Bhubaneswar, Gandhinagar.
  • Industrial & Public Sector Growth:
    • New industrial townships: Bhilai, Rourkela, Bokaro, Durgapur.
    • Urban growth linked to Five-Year Plans and PSU investments.
  • Urban Challenges:
    • Ruralโ€“urban migration led to rapid slum growth.
    • Limited housing, inadequate water and sanitation.
  • Institutional Changes:
    • Municipal reforms, Master Plans (e.g., Delhi Master Plan 1962).
    • Focus on urban-rural balance through Integrated Urban Development Programmes.

7. Liberalisation and Contemporary Urbanisation (1991 โ€“ Present)

  • Economic Reforms:
    • Shift to service economy; IT & BPO hubs like Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Pune emerged.
    • Special Economic Zones (SEZs) and real estate booms.
  • Infrastructure Projects:
    • Metro rail in Delhi (2002) followed by other cities.
    • Smart Cities Mission (2015), AMRUT, PMAY for housing.
  • Urban Forms:
    • Emergence of satellite towns (Gurugram, Noida, Navi Mumbai).
    • Mixed-use gated communities, malls, business districts.
  • Challenges:
    • Congestion, air pollution, water scarcity, and informal settlements.
    • Climate change impacts and resilience planning.
  • Recent Trends:
    • Focus on Transit-Oriented Development (TOD), non-motorised transport, and digital governance.
    • Integration of sustainability and climate resilience in urban policy.

Summary Table โ€“ Urbanisation in India (Chronology)

PeriodKey FeaturesExamples
Indus Valley (2600โ€“1500 BCE)Grid layout, drainage, tradeHarappa, Mohenjo-Daro
Second Urbanisation (600 BCEโ€“200 CE)Fortified cities, trade guildsPataliputra, Ujjain
Classical/Early Medieval (200โ€“1200 CE)Temple towns, port citiesKanchipuram, Thanjavur
Medieval (1200โ€“1757 CE)Islamic architecture, bazaarsDelhi, Agra, Surat
Colonial (1757โ€“1947 CE)Port cities, segregationBombay, Calcutta
Post-Independence (1947โ€“1991)Planned cities, industrial hubsChandigarh, Bhilai
Liberalisationโ€“Present (1991โ€“)IT hubs, TOD, Smart CitiesBengaluru, Gurugram

References

Ahluwalia, I. J. (2016). Challenges of urbanisation in India. Inย Contemporary issues in development economicsย (pp. 163-177). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Bhagat, R. B. (2011). Emerging pattern of urbanisation in India.ย Economic and political weekly, 10-12.

Dehalwar, K., & Sharma, S. N. (2024). Social Injustice Inflicted by Spatial Changes in Vernacular Settings: An Analysis of Published Literature.

Denis, E., Zรฉrah, M. H., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2017).ย Subaltern urbanisation in India. New Delhi: Springer.

Kadi, A. S., & Nelavigi, K. P. (2015). Growth of Urbanisation in India.ย The International Journal of Science and Technoledge,ย 3(7), 30.

Kundu, A. (2011, September).ย Trends and processes of urbanisation in India.

Kundu, A. (1983). Urbanisation in India: a contrast with western experience.ย Social Scientist, 37-49.

Kumar, G., Vyas, S., Sharma, S. N., & Dehalwar, K. (2025). Urban growth prediction using CA-ANN model and spatial analysis for planning policy in Indore city, India.ย GeoJournal,ย 90(3), 139.

Nath, V. (1986). Urbanisation in India: Review and prospects.ย Economic and Political Weekly, 339-352.

Sharma, S. N. (2018). Review of National Urban Policy Framework 2018.ย Think India Journal,ย 21(3), 74-81.

Sharma, S. N. (2005). Evaluation of the JnNURM Programme of Government of India for Urban Renewal.ย Think India Journal,ย 8(2), 1-7.