Schemes like PMAY-Urban (Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana – Urban) provide direct funding to ULBs for slum redevelopment and affordable housing.
Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) includes provisions for basic services to slums.
Funds are often transferred through State Urban Development Departments to ULBs based on project proposals.
State Government Support:
States have their own housing boards and urban development policies. For example, Maharashtra’s Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) model.
States often co-finance central schemes (e.g., PMAY-Urban follows a 60:40 Centre:State funding ratio for most states, 90:10 for NE and special category states).
ULB Own Revenues:
Property tax
User charges (for water, sanitation, etc.)
Development charges and betterment levies
Land monetization (leasing or selling municipal land)
2. Grants and Transfers
Finance Commission Grants:
The 15th Finance Commission allocates grants directly to urban local bodies, including a part for improving urban services (indirectly benefiting slums).
State Finance Commission Recommendations:
State governments allocate funds to ULBs based on their Finance Commission reports.
3. Loans and Credit Mechanisms
HUDCO (Housing and Urban Development Corporation Ltd):
Provides long-term, low-interest loans to ULBs for slum housing and basic services.
World Bank, ADB, and Multilateral Agencies:
Fund large urban development programs (e.g., Tamil Nadu Urban Development Fund).
ULBs can access these funds indirectly through state governments.
Pooled Finance Development Fund (PFDF):
Helps smaller ULBs access bond markets through pooled municipal bonds for infrastructure projects, including slum improvement.
4. Public-Private Partnerships (PPP)
Slum redevelopment projects are increasingly being implemented through PPP models, where:
Developers get rights to commercially exploit parts of land in exchange for rehabilitating slum dwellers.
Example: Mumbai’s SRA projects.
Viability Gap Funding (VGF):
Central government provides VGF to make projects commercially viable for private developers.
5. Community Participation and Beneficiary Contributions
Sweat Equity:
In situ slum redevelopment often uses community labor as a contribution to project costs.
Beneficiary Payments:
Minimal contributions are taken from slum dwellers in housing schemes (e.g., under PMAY-Urban, a nominal beneficiary share is required).
Self-Help Groups (SHGs) and Microfinance:
Used for incremental housing improvements and basic infrastructure upgradation.
6. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Funds
Companies are mandated (under the Companies Act, 2013) to invest 2% of their profits into CSR activities.
Some CSR initiatives fund housing, sanitation, and education projects in slums.
7. Innovative Financing Mechanisms
Land Value Capture (LVC):
ULBs capture a share of the increase in land value resulting from infrastructure improvements.
Tools include betterment charges, transfer of development rights (TDR), impact fees.
Municipal Bonds:
Cities like Pune have raised funds through municipal bonds for water supply and sanitation, indirectly impacting slum areas.
In short, funding at ULB level for slum improvement is a mix of public funding (both Union and State), ULB internal resources, loans, PPPs, community contributions, and innovative financing models like municipal bonds and land value capture.
Gender-sensitive planning interventions are deliberate strategies that acknowledge and address the different needs, experiences, and priorities of all genders, especially women and marginalized gender groups, in planning and development processes. Traditional planning practices — whether in urban development, policymaking, infrastructure design, or social programs — have often been male-centric, assuming that the “neutral citizen” is male. As a result, many systems unintentionally perpetuate gender inequalities.
Gender-sensitive planning moves beyond mere acknowledgment of gender differences; it actively seeks to create equitable spaces, opportunities, and outcomes for all. It integrates gender analysis into every stage of planning — from research to design, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation.
The Importance of Gender-Sensitive Planning
Addressing Systemic Inequalities: Societal structures often disadvantage women and gender-diverse individuals, whether in access to resources, decision-making, mobility, safety, or representation. Gender-sensitive planning can dismantle these barriers.
Enhancing Effectiveness: Programs and projects that consider diverse gendered needs tend to have better participation rates, more sustainable outcomes, and stronger community support.
Fostering Social Justice and Inclusion: Ensuring that all genders have equitable access to services, resources, and opportunities is a fundamental aspect of human rights and social justice.
Promoting Economic and Social Development: Gender equality is strongly linked to broader development goals such as poverty reduction, improved health outcomes, and economic growth.
Key Principles of Gender-Sensitive Planning
Participation and Representation: Ensuring that women and gender-diverse groups are meaningfully involved in decision-making processes.
Equity, Not Just Equality: Recognizing that equal treatment is not sufficient; specific measures may be needed to address existing inequalities.
Intersectionality: Understanding that gender interacts with other factors like race, class, ability, and age, shaping people’s experiences and needs.
Safety and Accessibility: Designing spaces and services that prioritize safety, mobility, and ease of access for everyone.
Flexibility: Adapting planning processes to different social, cultural, and economic contexts.
Accountability: Embedding monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to assess gender impacts and ensure commitments are met.
Stages of Gender-Sensitive Planning Interventions
1. Gender Analysis and Needs Assessment
Before designing interventions, planners must conduct a gender analysis to understand:
Roles and responsibilities differentiated by gender
Access to and control over resources
Specific needs, challenges, and opportunities faced by different gender groups
Power dynamics and cultural norms that influence gender relations
Tools and methods include:
Gender-disaggregated data collection
Focus group discussions with women and marginalized genders
Participatory rural appraisal (PRA)
Gender audits of existing policies and programs
2. Inclusive Goal Setting and Policy Development
Goals should explicitly aim to promote gender equity. For example:
Urban transport policies aiming to increase safety and accessibility for women commuters.
Agricultural programs ensuring equal access to land, training, and credit for women farmers.
Policies should be backed by clear commitments, resource allocation, and legal frameworks that support gender equity.
3. Design and Implementation
Design solutions should consider gender-specific needs:
Urban Infrastructure: Well-lit streets, safe public transport, accessible toilets for women, child-friendly public spaces.
Health Services: Maternal health care, reproductive services, mental health support sensitive to gender issues.
Economic Programs: Women-friendly banking, gender-sensitive vocational training, support for women entrepreneurs.
Implementation should ensure:
Equal participation of women and marginalized genders in implementation teams.
Flexibility in service delivery (e.g., providing childcare during public meetings).
4. Monitoring, Evaluation, and Feedback
Gender-sensitive indicators must be built into monitoring and evaluation frameworks. Examples:
Percentage of women participating in decision-making bodies.
Reduction in gender-based violence cases in public spaces.
Improved access to services for all genders.
Feedback loops should be established to adjust interventions based on real-world impacts and community input.
Examples of Gender-Sensitive Planning Interventions
1. Urban Transportation
Case Study: Vienna, Austria Urban planners in Vienna undertook gender-sensitive analysis and redesigned city spaces to better serve women, who often made multiple short trips with children or groceries. They expanded sidewalks, improved lighting, and added seating areas, making the city more accessible and safer.
2. Housing and Shelter
Women’s Shelter Projects: Housing designs that ensure privacy, safety, and accessibility for women survivors of domestic violence, with integrated childcare and legal support services.
3. Disaster Risk Reduction
Gender-Inclusive Disaster Planning: In many regions, women are more vulnerable during natural disasters due to caregiving roles or restrictions on mobility. Gender-sensitive disaster planning includes early warning systems, female-focused evacuation plans, and female-only spaces in refugee camps.
4. Rural Development
Women’s Agricultural Cooperatives: Rural development programs that support women’s cooperatives with access to seeds, training, credit, and markets, thereby empowering women economically and socially.
Challenges in Implementing Gender-Sensitive Planning
Resistance to Change: Deep-seated patriarchal norms can resist gender equity initiatives.
Limited Capacity: Planners may lack training or tools to effectively integrate gender perspectives.
Resource Constraints: Gender-sensitive measures often require additional investment in research, training, and community engagement.
Superficial Commitment: Tokenistic inclusion without genuine structural change can undermine the effectiveness of interventions.
Strategies to Strengthen Gender-Sensitive Planning
Capacity Building: Train planners, officials, and community leaders in gender analysis and gender mainstreaming.
Policy Mandates: Institutionalize gender-sensitive practices through legislation and policy guidelines.
Partnerships: Collaborate with women’s organizations, grassroots movements, and gender experts.
Funding Prioritization: Allocate specific budgets for gender-focused initiatives.
Continuous Learning: Treat gender-sensitive planning as an evolving practice, responsive to feedback and new insights.
Conclusion
Gender-sensitive planning interventions are critical for creating inclusive, equitable, and resilient societies. They move planning practices beyond a one-size-fits-all approach, acknowledging that people’s experiences and needs are deeply shaped by gender dynamics. By embedding gender perspectives into every phase of planning and implementation, governments, organizations, and communities can foster environments where everyone, regardless of gender, can thrive with dignity and opportunity.
References
Gurstein, P. (1996). Gender sensitive community planning: A case study of the Planning Ourselves In Project. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 199-219.
Horelli, L., & Wallin, S. (2016). Gender-sensitive e-planning for sustaining everyday life. In Fair Shared Cities (pp. 231-247). Routledge.
Jaeckel, M., & van Geldermalsen, M. (2006). Gender sensitive urban planing. Urbanism & Gender, 95.
Jafry, T., & Sulaiman V, R. (2013). Gender-sensitive approaches to extension programme design. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 19(5), 469-485.
Rodríguez-García, M. J., & Donati, F. (2021). European integral urban policies from a gender perspective. Gender-sensitive measures, transversality and gender approaches. Sustainability, 13(17), 9543.
Dehalwar, K. Gender and Its Implications for Spatial Planning: Understanding the Impact.
In an increasingly complex and interconnected world, stakeholder participation has become essential for effective governance, community development, corporate responsibility, and environmental management. Stakeholders — individuals, groups, or organizations affected by or interested in a particular issue — bring diverse perspectives, interests, and resources to decision-making processes. However, fostering genuine participation is often challenging. This is where sociological understanding becomes a critical tool, offering deep insights into the dynamics of social behavior, group interactions, power relations, and cultural contexts that influence stakeholder engagement.
The Role of Sociology in Stakeholder Participation
Sociology is the study of society, social relationships, and social institutions. By applying sociological principles and methods, facilitators of stakeholder participation can better navigate complexities such as differing values, systemic inequalities, and community dynamics. Sociology helps to answer key questions: Who are the stakeholders? What are their motivations? How do social structures and cultural backgrounds shape their participation? What barriers exist to inclusive engagement?
Let’s explore the various ways sociological understanding enhances stakeholder participation:
1. Identifying and Mapping Stakeholders Accurately
Sociological methods like ethnography, surveys, and social network analysis allow for a comprehensive identification of stakeholders, beyond just the most vocal or visible groups. It helps uncover marginalized or less obvious stakeholders — such as indigenous communities, informal workers, or future generations — who may otherwise be overlooked. Sociology insists on understanding the relational ties between groups, highlighting alliances, tensions, and dependencies crucial for inclusive participation.
2. Appreciating Diversity and Cultural Contexts
Stakeholders come from diverse social, ethnic, and cultural backgrounds, each with their own worldviews, communication styles, and decision-making processes. Sociological sensitivity to cultural diversity helps in designing participation processes that are respectful and inclusive. Recognizing cultural narratives, traditional knowledge systems, and collective identities ensures that participation is not merely tokenistic but meaningful.
3. Understanding Power Dynamics and Social Inequalities
Stakeholder participation does not occur on an equal footing. Certain groups often hold more power, resources, or influence, while others are marginalized. Sociology provides analytical tools to examine power relations, social stratification, and institutional biases. This understanding is vital to creating participatory processes that consciously address power imbalances — for example, by giving marginalized groups a stronger voice or designing processes that reduce barriers to entry.
4. Enhancing Communication and Trust-Building
Effective stakeholder participation relies on open communication and trust. Sociological insights into group behavior, conflict resolution, and norms of reciprocity help facilitators design engagement strategies that foster dialogue, empathy, and trust. This could include using participatory approaches like focus groups, storytelling, or deliberative forums that allow stakeholders to express their perspectives in a safe and supportive environment.
5. Fostering Collective Action and Social Learning
Participation is not just about collecting individual opinions; it is about fostering collective action and building shared understanding. Sociology emphasizes the role of social learning — the process by which stakeholders learn from each other through interaction and dialogue. By understanding how norms evolve, how consensus is built, and how collective identities are formed, facilitators can create spaces that support collaborative problem-solving and innovation.
6. Anticipating Resistance and Managing Conflict
Participation processes often encounter resistance, especially when stakeholders perceive threats to their interests or identities. Sociological understanding of group conflict, social movements, and resistance dynamics allows practitioners to anticipate potential sources of tension and design conflict-sensitive engagement strategies. Rather than avoiding conflict, they can use it constructively to surface underlying issues and build more robust agreements.
7. Evaluating Participation Processes
Finally, sociology provides frameworks and methodologies for evaluating the effectiveness and inclusivity of participation processes. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation methods can assess not just outcomes, but also the quality of the engagement — who participated, whose voices were heard, and what changes were made as a result.
Practical Applications: Examples
Urban Planning: In community-driven urban development, sociological insights help planners engage diverse groups, understand local identities, and mediate conflicts between residents and developers.
Environmental Management: In conservation projects, recognizing indigenous knowledge systems and power imbalances helps ensure that environmental policies are co-created with local communities rather than imposed upon them.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Companies seeking stakeholder input on CSR initiatives benefit from understanding social expectations, cultural values, and local community dynamics to build trust and legitimacy.
Conclusion
Sociological understanding is not just an academic exercise — it is a practical necessity for meaningful stakeholder participation. By bringing a deep awareness of social complexity, cultural diversity, and power relations, sociology equips practitioners to design participatory processes that are inclusive, equitable, and transformative. In a world facing complex social and environmental challenges, integrating sociological insights into stakeholder engagement is not only beneficial but essential for sustainable and just outcomes.
References
Bell, S., Morse, S., & Shah, R. A. (2012). Understanding stakeholder participation in research as part of sustainable development. Journal of environmental management, 101, 13-22.
Dehalwar, K., & Singh, J. Determining the Role of Different Stakeholders Towards Sustainable Water Management within Bhopal. Madhya Pradesh.
DEHALWAR, K., & SINGH, J. DETERMINING THE ROLE OF DIFFERENT STAKEHOLDERS TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE WATER MANAGEMENT WITHIN BHOPAL, MADHYA PRADESH.
Fish, R., Saratsi, E., Reed, M., & Keune, H. (2016). Stakeholder participation in ecosystem service decision-making. In Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services (pp. 256-270). Routledge.
Jain, S., Dehalwar, K., & Sharma, S. N. (2024). Explanation of Delphi Research Method and Expert Opinion Surveys.
Luyet, V., Schlaepfer, R., Parlange, M. B., & Buttler, A. (2012). A framework to implement stakeholder participation in environmental projects. Journal of environmental management, 111, 213-219.
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431.
Sharma, S. N. (2020). Evaluation of Implementation of Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (Urban). Think India Journal, 1, 1-13.
Zheng, X., Sun, C. & Liu, J. Exploring stakeholder engagement in urban village renovation projects through a mixed-method approach to social network analysis: a case study of Tianjin. Humanit Soc Sci Commun11, 27 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02536-7
Human societies, since their inception, have organized themselves into hierarchies. Two fundamental systems by which people have been historically classified are the caste system and the class system. Each system structures social relations and individual identities differently, particularly in how they handle status: ascribed versus achieved. Understanding the difference between ascribed and achieved status helps us appreciate the dynamics of privilege, mobility, and inequality that persist across societies.
Caste System: A Structure of Ascribed Status
The caste system is a rigid, hereditary social order. It is most famously associated with India, but caste-like systems have existed elsewhere too, including in medieval Europe (feudal estates) and among certain African and East Asian societies.
Key Features of the Caste System:
Hereditary: Membership is assigned at birth.
Immutable: One’s caste generally cannot be changed over a lifetime.
Endogamy: Marriage occurs strictly within the same caste.
Occupation: Often linked to caste, determining the work one can perform.
Religious sanction: Often supported by religious or philosophical justifications.
Ascribed Status in the Caste System
Ascribed status refers to the social position a person is born into, without choice or effort. In a caste system, status is entirely ascribed. For example, being born into a Brahmin family (priestly class in Hinduism) bestows honor and authority regardless of personal achievement. Conversely, being born into a Dalit (formerly known as “Untouchable”) family imposes social stigma and exclusion, no matter the individual’s talents or efforts.
The caste system, therefore, limits social mobility almost completely, maintaining social stratification across generations.
Class System: A More Fluid Hierarchy
The class system, prominent in industrial and post-industrial societies (such as in Europe, the Americas, and parts of Asia), is based on economic position and other social factors like education and occupation.
Key Features of the Class System:
Economic Basis: Wealth, income, education, and occupational prestige are central.
Relative Fluidity: Individuals can move up or down the class ladder (social mobility).
Achievement and Merit: While inequalities exist, personal effort can change one’s social standing.
Achieved Status in the Class System
Achieved status refers to a social position that a person attains largely through their own efforts, choices, talents, and accomplishments. For instance, a person born into a working-class family who becomes a successful entrepreneur exemplifies achieved status.
Although class systems promote meritocracy — the idea that talent and effort should determine social standing — structural barriers like systemic racism, unequal access to education, and inherited wealth still make upward mobility difficult for many.
Thus, while class systems theoretically allow for mobility through achieved status, in reality, ascribed advantages (such as family wealth or social connections) still heavily influence outcomes.
Intersection of Ascribed and Achieved Status
In practice, caste and class characteristics often intertwine. Even in a class-based society:
Race, ethnicity, gender, and family background (forms of ascribed status) significantly affect life chances.
Achievements can be constrained or boosted by one’s ascribed traits.
Similarly, in caste societies undergoing modernization (like India), economic liberalization and education have created new opportunities for individual achievement, though caste-based discrimination persists in subtler forms.
Thus, no society is purely ascriptive or purely achievement-based — both factors usually coexist in complex ways.
Comparative Overview
Aspect
Caste System
Class System
Basis of stratification
Birth and hereditary occupation
Economic position, education, and achievements
Social Mobility
Very limited
Possible (both upward and downward)
Status Type
Ascribed
Primarily achieved, but also influenced by ascription
Marriage Practices
Endogamy (within caste)
Generally exogamous, though class endogamy still exists informally
Persistence across generations
High
Medium to High (depending on societal structure)
Conclusion
The concepts of ascribed status and achieved status are crucial to understanding social hierarchies. The caste system is emblematic of ascribed status, where birth predetermines one’s entire life trajectory. The class system, while more fluid and centered around achieved status, still reveals the lingering power of ascribed traits.
As societies evolve, the tension between inherited privilege and earned success continues to shape debates around fairness, opportunity, and justice. Understanding these dynamics is essential for envisioning a more equitable world where individual potential, rather than accident of birth, determines destiny.
References
Kosambi, D. D. (1944). Caste and class in India. Science & Society, 243-249.
Mukherjee, R. (1999). Caste in itself, caste and class, or caste in class. Economic and political weekly, 1759-1761.
Olcott, M. (1944). The caste system of India. American Sociological Review, 648-657.
Sharma, K. L. (1984). Caste and class in India: Some conceptual problems. Sociological Bulletin, 33(1-2), 1-28.
Ranadive, B. T. (1979). Caste, class and property relations. Economic and Political Weekly, 337-348.
Sharma, S. N. Differences Between Caste System and Class System.
The Disaster Management Cycle is a continuous process of phases and activities that aim to reduce the impact of disasters, prepare for them, respond effectively during the disaster, and recover from its effects. This cycle is often depicted as a circular process, where each phase leads into the next, with ongoing learning and improvements. Here’s a detailed breakdown of each phase of the Disaster Management Cycle:
1. Mitigation (Prevention)
This phase involves measures taken to reduce or eliminate the risks of disasters. The focus is on preventing disasters from happening or minimizing their impacts when they do occur. Mitigation can include:
Risk assessment to identify vulnerable areas and people.
Implementing building codes and regulations to ensure structures can withstand disasters (e.g., earthquakes, floods).
Environmental protection efforts, like floodplain management or forest fire prevention.
Educating the public about disaster risks and prevention measures.
Planning for risk reduction, such as relocating populations from high-risk areas.
2. Preparedness (Planning and Training)
Preparedness refers to the planning, training, and coordination activities that ensure a rapid and efficient response in the event of a disaster. The goal is to enhance the ability of individuals, communities, and organizations to respond effectively. Key elements include:
Developing disaster response plans for different types of hazards.
Creating emergency response teams and training them in disaster-specific scenarios.
Establishing early warning systems to alert communities of impending disasters (e.g., tsunamis, storms).
Conducting drills and exercises to practice coordination and communication among emergency responders and communities.
Public awareness campaigns to inform people of evacuation routes, shelters, and other safety measures.
3. Response (Immediate Action)
The response phase occurs immediately before, during, and after the disaster, where the focus is on saving lives, providing basic needs, and minimizing the impact of the disaster. Actions taken include:
Search and rescue operations to locate and aid survivors.
Providing emergency shelter for displaced individuals and families.
Delivering food, water, and medical supplies to affected populations.
Setting up emergency communication networks to provide information and coordinate response efforts.
Deploying emergency personnel and equipment, including first responders, medical teams, and security forces.
Providing temporary health care, addressing injuries, and preventing the spread of diseases in disaster-affected areas.
4. Recovery (Rebuilding and Restoration)
Recovery is the process of restoring normalcy and rebuilding what was damaged or destroyed. The goal is to bring the affected communities back to a state of functional stability and ensure sustainable development. Recovery can take months to years, depending on the severity of the disaster. Key activities include:
Restoring essential services, like electricity, water supply, and sanitation.
Rebuilding infrastructure, such as roads, schools, hospitals, and homes.
Providing financial and psychological support to affected individuals and businesses.
Assessing and restoring the economy by rebuilding livelihoods and employment opportunities.
Monitoring and evaluating the recovery process to ensure that it is progressing efficiently and effectively.
Addressing long-term resilience, ensuring that communities are better prepared for future disasters by improving infrastructure, social services, and community engagement.
5. Rehabilitation (Long-term Support and Recovery)
Rehabilitation can be considered a part of the recovery process but is often a distinct phase, focusing on the longer-term social, economic, and environmental needs of the affected population. This phase seeks to help communities return to a normal or improved level of function and well-being. Activities in this phase may include:
Long-term housing reconstruction for displaced populations.
Restoring livelihoods and income generation activities for individuals and families affected by the disaster.
Addressing mental health and providing trauma support for survivors.
Rehabilitation of natural resources, such as forests, rivers, and farmlands, that may have been damaged during the disaster.
6. Learning and Adaptation (Post-Event Analysis)
While not always shown as a formal phase, learning from each disaster and adapting for future events is critical. After a disaster, governments, organizations, and communities assess their response to identify strengths and weaknesses. This phase helps to:
Conduct post-event reviews and evaluations to assess the effectiveness of response and recovery.
Identify gaps and lessons learned, which are crucial for improving disaster management strategies.
Update disaster response plans, policies, and procedures based on the lessons learned.
Integrate new technologies and strategies to improve disaster mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery in future events.
Encourage community participation and feedback to improve local knowledge and preparedness.
The Importance of the Disaster Management Cycle
Continuity: The cycle emphasizes that disaster management is not a one-time effort. It’s an ongoing process that involves continuous improvement.
Risk reduction: By focusing on preparedness and mitigation, the cycle helps reduce the potential loss of life and property in the event of a disaster.
Efficiency: A well-planned cycle helps ensure that response and recovery efforts are swift, organized, and effective, ultimately saving lives and minimizing the impact of the disaster.
Each phase of the disaster management cycle is interconnected, and success in one phase helps improve the overall effectiveness of the entire cycle.
References
Dehalwar, K. (2015). Basics of environment sustainability and environmental impact assessment. Basics of Environment Sustainability and Environmental Impact Assessment, 1-208.
Dehalwar, K. Bridging the Gap: Community-Based and Workshop-Based Approaches to Address Rural and Urban Planning Issues.
Joyce, K. E., Wright, K. C., Samsonov, S. V., & Ambrosia, V. G. (2009). Remote sensing and the disaster management cycle. Advances in geoscience and remote sensing, 48(7), 317-346.
Rana, I. A., Asim, M., Aslam, A. B., & Jamshed, A. (2021). Disaster management cycle and its application for flood risk reduction in urban areas of Pakistan. Urban Climate, 38, 100893.
Sawalha, I. H. (2020). A contemporary perspective on the disaster management cycle. foresight, 22(4), 469-482.
Tay, H. L., Banomyong, R., Varadejsatitwong, P., & Julagasigorn, P. (2022). Mitigating risks in the disaster management cycle. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2022(1), 7454760.
A Community-Based Organization (CBO) is a non-profit group formed by local people to address the specific needs of their community. These organizations work at the grassroots level to improve education, healthcare, employment, environment, and social welfare.
CBOs are different from larger non-governmental organizations (NGOs) because they focus on localized issues and are managed by community members themselves.
Characteristics of Community-Based Organizations
Local Focus
Operate within a specific neighborhood, town, or village.
Address local issues like sanitation, education, and healthcare.
Community Participation
Run by volunteers and local leaders who understand the community’s problems.
Encourage active involvement of local people in decision-making.
Non-Profit and Self-Governed
Do not aim to make a profit; all resources go toward community development.
Independently managed by local members rather than external agencies.
Resource Mobilization
Rely on donations, fundraising, government support, and volunteer work.
Some CBOs may receive small grants from NGOs or government programs.
Flexible and Adaptive
Quickly respond to emerging community needs like disaster relief or unemployment.
Types of Community-Based Organizations
1. Health and Wellness CBOs
Provide healthcare, maternal care, and disease awareness programs.
Example: Community clinics, HIV/AIDS awareness groups.
2. Educational CBOs
Promote literacy, school enrollment, and skill development.
Example: Village tutoring centers, after-school programs, scholarship funds.
3. Environmental CBOs
Work on conservation, waste management, and clean water initiatives.
Example: Local tree-planting groups, community clean-up drives.
4. Women and Child Welfare CBOs
Focus on women empowerment, child protection, and family support.
Example: Self-help groups (SHGs), women’s microfinance cooperatives.
5. Economic Development CBOs
Support local entrepreneurship, provide vocational training, and help in job creation.
Example: Handicraft cooperatives, farmer support groups.
6. Disaster Relief and Emergency Response CBOs
Assist during natural disasters, pandemics, and economic crises.
Example: Local Red Cross chapters, flood relief groups.
Functions of Community-Based Organizations
Addressing Local Issues
Identify problems specific to the community and work on solutions.
Example: Organizing water conservation projects in drought-prone villages.
Providing Basic Services
Offer healthcare, education, clean drinking water, and sanitation services.
Empowering Marginalized Groups
Support women, minorities, disabled individuals, and low-income families.
Enhancing Economic Development
Help people develop job skills, provide microloans, and support local businesses.
Promoting Social Change and Awareness
Conduct awareness campaigns on topics like hygiene, domestic violence, and child rights.
Advocacy and Policy Influence
Act as a voice for the community, influencing government policies for local development.
Encouraging Volunteerism and Community Participation
Strengthen community bonds by involving people in collective action.
Importance of Community-Based Organizations
1. Grassroots Impact
Since they operate at the local level, they directly impact people’s daily lives.
2. Cost-Effective Development
Rely on volunteers and local resources, making them more sustainable.
3. Bridge Between Government and People
Help government schemes reach the intended beneficiaries.
CBOs act faster than large organizations in times of emergency or crisis.
5. Empowerment and Self-Sufficiency
Help communities become self-reliant instead of depending on outside aid.
Challenges Faced by Community-Based Organizations
Lack of Funding
Many CBOs struggle to secure enough financial support.
Limited Skilled Personnel
Often rely on volunteers, leading to challenges in management and expertise.
Government Restrictions and Bureaucracy
Some CBOs face difficulties in getting official recognition or funding.
Sustainability Issues
Many small CBOs shut down due to a lack of long-term support.
Resistance to Change
Some community members may resist new ideas due to traditions or misinformation.
Conclusion
Community-Based Organizations (CBOs) play a vital role in local development, social empowerment, and grassroots activism. They help in solving community-specific issues by engaging local people in decision-making and implementation.
Despite challenges, they remain a crucial force in healthcare, education, women’s empowerment, economic development, and environmental conservation. Strengthening CBOs with better resources and government support can lead to more self-reliant and resilient communities.
Discussion Question:
Have you ever been part of a local community project? What impact did it have on your neighborhood or village?
Voluntary Organizations: Meaning, Types, Functions, and Importance
Introduction
A voluntary organization is a group formed by individuals who come together voluntarily to achieve a common goal, often for social, cultural, or humanitarian purposes. These organizations operate independently of the government and are typically non-profit. They rely on donations, grants, and volunteer work rather than seeking financial gain.
Voluntary organizations play a crucial role in community development, social welfare, disaster relief, and advocacy for various causes such as education, health, and human rights.
Characteristics of Voluntary Organizations
Non-Profit Nature
These organizations are not focused on making money but on serving a social cause.
Any funds raised are reinvested into the organization’s mission.
Voluntary Membership
Individuals choose to join and participate without coercion.
Membership is often open to anyone who supports the cause.
Self-Governance
They operate independently and are not controlled by the government or commercial interests.
They have their own leadership and decision-making processes.
Service-Oriented
Their primary goal is to help society through activities like education, healthcare, and disaster relief.
Funding Through Donations and Grants
They rely on donations, grants, and fundraising rather than business profits.
Some receive government support but maintain autonomy.
Volunteer-Based Workforce
Many voluntary organizations depend on unpaid volunteers, though some may employ staff for key functions.
Types of Voluntary Organizations
1. Charitable Organizations
Focus on providing aid to the needy, such as food banks, orphanages, and homeless shelters.
Example: Red Cross, Save the Children, UNICEF
2. Advocacy Organizations
Work to influence policies and raise awareness about social, environmental, and human rights issues.
Example: Greenpeace (environment), Amnesty International (human rights)
3. Religious Organizations
Run by religious institutions to provide social services like education, healthcare, and disaster relief.
Example: Catholic Charities, Islamic Relief, Hindu Seva Kendras
4. Educational and Research Organizations
Focus on spreading knowledge, running schools, providing scholarships, and conducting research.
Example: Teach for All, Khan Academy
5. Health and Medical Organizations
Provide healthcare services, run hospitals, and work on disease prevention.
Example: Doctors Without Borders, WHO (World Health Organization)
6. Environmental Organizations
Work on conservation, climate change, pollution control, and wildlife protection.
Example: WWF (World Wildlife Fund), Greenpeace
7. Cultural and Recreational Organizations
Promote arts, culture, sports, and community activities.
Example: Rotary Club, Lions Club
8. Self-Help Groups (SHGs) and Cooperatives
Small groups that provide financial and social support to members.
Example: Microfinance groups, women’s self-help groups
Functions of Voluntary Organizations
Providing Social Welfare Services
Offer aid to the poor, elderly, disabled, and underprivileged communities.
Advocacy and Human Rights Protection
Raise awareness about social injustices and lobby for policy changes.
Disaster Relief and Humanitarian Aid
Help communities affected by natural disasters, wars, and crises.
Health and Medical Services
Provide free or affordable healthcare, vaccinations, and disease awareness programs.
Educational Support
Run schools, provide scholarships, and promote literacy programs.
Environmental Conservation
Work on afforestation, water conservation, and pollution control.
Women and Child Welfare
Support gender equality, provide shelters for abused women, and run child welfare programs.
Skill Development and Employment Generation
Train people in various skills to improve their job prospects.
Importance of Voluntary Organizations
1. Bridging Gaps in Government Services
Governments often fail to reach every section of society; voluntary organizations fill these gaps by providing necessary services.
2. Encouraging Community Participation
They empower local communities to take charge of their development.
3. Promoting Social Change
Organizations raise awareness about important issues like climate change, poverty, and human rights.
4. Supporting Economic Development
Many voluntary organizations work in microfinance, vocational training, and entrepreneurship, improving people’s livelihoods.
5. Disaster Response and Crisis Management
During crises like earthquakes, floods, or pandemics, voluntary organizations provide rapid relief and rehabilitation.
Challenges Faced by Voluntary Organizations
Funding Issues
Dependence on donations and grants can make financial stability uncertain.
Lack of Skilled Personnel
Relying on volunteers can create challenges in managing operations efficiently.
Government Regulations and Bureaucracy
Strict laws and government interference can limit their activities.
Sustainability
Many organizations struggle to maintain long-term impact due to resource constraints.
Accountability and Transparency
Some organizations face criticism for mismanagement of funds and lack of transparency.
Conclusion
Voluntary organizations play a vital role in social welfare, advocacy, disaster relief, and education. They complement government efforts and empower communities to improve their own conditions. Despite challenges, these organizations remain an essential force for social change and humanitarian work.
Discussion Question: Have you ever volunteered for an organization? How was your experience, and what impact did it have on you or your community?
Culture of Space in the Context of Sociology and Settlement Planning
The culture of space is a critical concept in sociology and settlement planning, referring to the ways in which humans perceive, use, and shape space based on cultural, social, economic, and environmental factors. It explores the relationships between space, identity, power, and social structures, influencing how communities are designed and function. This concept is deeply rooted in social interactions, urban planning, and spatial justice.
1. Culture of Space in Sociology
A. Social Construction of Space
Space is not just a physical entity; it is socially constructed based on historical, cultural, and economic processes. Sociologists argue that space is shaped by:
Cultural norms and traditions: Different societies have unique ways of organizing and utilizing space, such as communal courtyards in Middle Eastern homes or open piazzas in European cities.
Social hierarchies and power dynamics: Access to and control over space is often determined by class, gender, ethnicity, and economic status (e.g., gated communities vs. informal settlements).
Symbolism and identity: Spaces hold symbolic meanings (e.g., religious sites, historical monuments) that influence cultural identity and collective memory.
B. Spatial Segregation and Inequality
Space is often a reflection of social inequalities:
Gentrification: The displacement of lower-income communities due to urban redevelopment and rising property values.
Segregation by race/class: The historical separation of communities based on race or economic status (e.g., redlining in the U.S. or caste-based spatial divisions in India).
Public vs. private spaces: The unequal distribution of public spaces, parks, and green areas affects the quality of life of different social groups.
C. Everyday Life and Spatial Practices
Personal vs. public space: Different cultures have varying perceptions of personal space (e.g., crowded markets in Asia vs. personal bubbles in Western societies).
Urban rhythms: The way people move and interact in cities is influenced by cultural habits (e.g., siestas in Spain, 24/7 work culture in big cities).
Gendered spaces: Certain spaces are considered male-dominated (e.g., construction sites, boardrooms) or female-dominated (e.g., domestic settings, shopping areas).
2. Culture of Space in Settlement Planning
A. The Role of Culture in Urban Design
Cultural values shape how settlements are planned, influencing:
Architecture and urban form: Traditional housing styles reflect climate, materials, and social organization (e.g., courtyard houses in China vs. detached homes in suburban America).
Street patterns and public spaces: Islamic cities have winding streets for privacy, while European cities often have large squares and plazas for social gatherings.
Religious and communal spaces: Temples, mosques, churches, and community centers are central to settlement planning in many societies.
B. Spatial Justice and Inclusion
A culturally sensitive approach to urban planning considers:
Equitable access to public spaces: Ensuring parks, transportation, and recreational areas are available to all social groups.
Participatory planning: Involving local communities in decision-making to create culturally appropriate spaces.
Affordable housing and mixed-use development: Balancing economic growth with social equity to prevent displacement.
C. Sustainability and Cultural Resilience
Traditional knowledge in planning: Indigenous and vernacular architecture often incorporate sustainable techniques like passive cooling and water harvesting.
Smart cities and cultural heritage: Balancing technological advancement with the preservation of cultural identity (e.g., integrating historical districts with modern infrastructure).
Disaster resilience: Understanding how cultural practices influence settlement patterns in disaster-prone areas (e.g., stilt houses in flood-prone regions).
Conclusion
The culture of space is a dynamic and evolving concept that bridges sociology and settlement planning. Understanding how people interact with space—both socially and physically—helps create more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable settlements. By integrating cultural values into urban design and policy-making, planners and sociologists can foster environments that reflect and respect the diversity of human societies.
Social stratification is a fundamental aspect of human societies, organizing individuals based on certain hierarchical structures. Two significant systems of stratification are the caste system and the class system. While both determine social positioning and influence an individual’s life experiences, they differ in terms of mobility, rigidity, origin, and the criteria for stratification. This article explores the major differences between these two systems.
Definition and Origins
Caste System
The caste system is a hereditary form of social stratification that divides individuals into distinct, rigid groups based on birth. This system has been historically prevalent in societies such as India, Nepal, and parts of Africa. It is often linked to religious doctrines, especially in Hindu society, where it is associated with the Varna system—Brahmins (priests), Kshatriyas (warriors), Vaishyas (traders), and Shudras (laborers), with Dalits (formerly known as untouchables) outside the hierarchy.
Class System
The class system is an open form of social stratification based on economic status, occupation, education, and wealth. It is more prevalent in industrialized and capitalist societies such as the United States and Europe. Unlike the caste system, class is not strictly determined by birth but rather by achievements, opportunities, and socio-economic conditions.
Key Differences
1. Basis of Stratification
Caste System: Based primarily on birth, religion, and traditional customs.
Class System: Based on economic factors, occupation, education, and achievements.
2. Social Mobility
Caste System: Social mobility is highly restricted; individuals remain in the caste they are born into for life.
Class System: Offers greater mobility; individuals can move up or down the social hierarchy through education, occupation, and economic success.
3. Rigidity vs. Flexibility
Caste System: Highly rigid and unchangeable; inter-caste mobility is almost impossible.
Class System: More flexible; people can change their class through effort and external circumstances.
4. Endogamy vs. Exogamy
Caste System: Encourages endogamy (marriage within the same caste) to maintain social purity.
Class System: Allows exogamy (marriage between different social classes), and social mobility often occurs through marriage.
5. Legal and Social Recognition
Caste System: Legally recognized in some countries, especially where caste-based reservations exist.
Class System: Not legally recognized but exists as an economic and social reality.
6. Impact on Social Relations
Caste System: Creates social divisions with limited interaction between different castes.
Class System: Allows for interaction across classes, though economic disparities may still limit relationships.
7. Economic and Occupational Influence
Caste System: Determines occupation traditionally, with little to no choice in profession.
Class System: Individuals have the freedom to choose their professions based on their skills and interests.
Modern-Day Relevance
Caste System Today
Despite legal abolitions, caste-based discrimination persists in many societies, particularly in India and South Asia. Affirmative action policies, such as reservations in education and employment, aim to uplift marginalized groups.
Class System Today
Class divisions continue to exist in capitalist economies, where income inequality and wealth gaps influence social mobility. Governments implement taxation, social welfare, and education policies to reduce class disparities.
Conclusion
While both the caste system and the class system create hierarchical divisions in society, the former is rigid and birth-based, while the latter is flexible and achievement-based. The caste system is deeply entrenched in tradition and religion, whereas the class system is shaped by economic and social factors. Understanding these distinctions is crucial in addressing social inequality and promoting inclusivity in modern societies.
References
Dehalwar, K., & Sharma, S. N. (2024). Politics in the Name of Women’s Reservation. Contemporary Voice of Dalit, 2455328X241262562.
Dehalwar, K., & Sharma, S. N. (2024). Social Injustice Inflicted by Spatial Changes in Vernacular Settings: An Analysis of Published Literature.
Mukherjee, R. (1999). Caste in itself, caste and class, or caste in class. Economic and political weekly, 1759-1761.
Olcott, M. (1944). The caste system of India. American Sociological Review, 648-657.
Ranadive, B. T. (1979). Caste, class and property relations. Economic and Political Weekly, 337-348.
Sharma, K. L. (1984). Caste and class in India: Some conceptual problems. Sociological Bulletin, 33(1-2), 1-28.
Spatial planning plays a critical role in shaping the physical environment of communities, influencing how people interact with their surroundings and access resources and opportunities. However, the planning process is often influenced by various social factors, including gender. Gender refers to the social, cultural, and economic attributes and roles associated with being male or female, which can significantly influence how individuals experience and navigate spaces. Understanding the implications of gender on spatial planning is essential for creating inclusive and equitable environments that meet the diverse needs of all community members.
One of the primary ways gender influences spatial planning is through the creation of gendered spaces. Gendered spaces are areas that are designed, perceived, and used differently by men and women due to societal norms, cultural practices, and individual preferences. For example, public transportation systems, parks, and recreational facilities may be designed with specific gender biases, impacting accessibility and usability for different genders. Women, for instance, may perceive certain spaces as unsafe due to inadequate lighting or lack of surveillance, limiting their mobility and access to public amenities.
Furthermore, the division of labor based on gender roles can influence spatial patterns. For instance, women often bear the primary responsibility for caregiving and household chores, which can affect their travel patterns and access to essential services such as healthcare and education. Spatial planning must consider these gendered dynamics to ensure that infrastructure and services are distributed equitably and efficiently, addressing the needs of all members of the community.
Safety and Security
Gender also plays a significant role in perceptions of safety and security within the built environment. Women, in particular, may experience harassment, violence, or fear of crime in public spaces, which can restrict their freedom of movement and limit their participation in social and economic activities. Spatial planning strategies such as urban design, lighting, and surveillance measures can help mitigate these risks and create safer environments for all genders.
Inclusive Design and Accessibility
An inclusive approach to spatial planning involves designing environments that accommodate the needs of diverse populations, including different genders, ages, abilities, and socioeconomic backgrounds. Gender-sensitive design considers how spaces are used and experienced by men, women, and non-binary individuals, ensuring that infrastructure, facilities, and services are accessible and welcoming to all.
For example, public restrooms are often designed with binary gender distinctions, which can be exclusionary for transgender and gender-nonconforming individuals. Gender-inclusive design promotes the creation of gender-neutral facilities that accommodate diverse identities and preferences, fostering inclusivity and reducing stigma and discrimination.
Participation and Decision-Making
Gender dynamics also influence participation and decision-making processes in spatial planning. Women and other marginalized groups are often underrepresented in planning processes, resulting in policies and interventions that may not adequately address their needs and priorities. Engaging diverse stakeholders, including women, in decision-making processes can lead to more inclusive and responsive spatial planning outcomes.
Furthermore, empowering women as planners, policymakers, and community leaders can help challenge existing gender norms and biases within the planning profession, promoting greater gender equity in urban and regional development initiatives.
Conclusion
Gender is a fundamental aspect of spatial planning, shaping how individuals experience and interact with the built environment. Recognizing and addressing the implications of gender in spatial planning is essential for creating inclusive, safe, and equitable communities where all individuals can thrive. By adopting a gender-sensitive approach to planning and design, policymakers, planners, and stakeholders can work towards building cities and regions that reflect the diverse needs and aspirations of their populations.
References
Damyanovic, D. (2016). Gender mainstreaming as a strategy for sustainable urban planning. In Fair Shared Cities (pp. 177-192). Routledge.
Dehalwar, K., & Singh, J. (2015). Current State of Water Management System: Case Review of Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. International Journal of Civil, Structural, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering Research and Development (IJCSEIERD), 5(6), 35-40.
Dehalwar, K. Understanding the Dynamics of Peri-Urban Areas: Navigating the Interface Between Urban and Rural Realms.
Garcia-Ramon, M. D., Ortiz, A., & Prats, M. (2004). Urban planning, gender and the use of public space in a peripherial neighbourhood of Barcelona. Cities, 21(3), 215-223.
Malaza, N., Todes, A., & Williamson, A. (2009). Gender in planning and urban development.
McDowell, L. (1983). Towards an understanding of the gender division of urban space. Environment and planning D: Society and Space, 1(1), 59-72.
Rakodi, C. (1991). Cities and people: Towards a gender‐aware urban planning process?. Public Administration and Development, 11(6), 541-559.
Sánchez de Madariaga, I., & Neuman, M. (2016). Mainstreaming gender in the city. Town Planning Review, 87(5), 493-504.
Sharma, S. N. (2014). Participatory Planning in Plan Preparation. BookCountry.
Spain, D. (2014). Gender and urban space. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 581-598.
Track2Training 
You must be logged in to post a comment.