Tag: urban-farming

Bridging the Gap: Community-Based and Workshop-Based Approaches to Address Rural and Urban Planning Issues

By Kavita Dehalwar

The dynamics of rural and urban spaces are constantly evolving, presenting unique challenges and opportunities for planners and policymakers. In both settings, community engagement and participatory approaches are essential for sustainable development. However, the methodologies to address issues in rural and urban areas differ due to their distinct characteristics. This article explores the significance of community-based and workshop-based methods in tackling planning issues in both rural and urban environments.

Photo by Charlotte May on Pexels.com

Rural Planning Issues:

Rural areas often face challenges such as limited access to basic amenities, inadequate infrastructure, economic disparities, and environmental degradation. These issues require tailored solutions that consider the specific needs and contexts of rural communities. Community-based methods involve active participation of local residents, stakeholders, and community organizations in the planning process. This approach acknowledges the unique knowledge and perspectives of rural inhabitants, empowering them to be co-creators of their own development.

Community-based methods in rural planning often include participatory rural appraisal (PRA), community mapping, focus group discussions, and consensus-building exercises. These methods facilitate inclusive decision-making, foster social cohesion, and promote ownership of development initiatives. By engaging local communities, planners can gain insights into the socio-economic dynamics, cultural heritage, and environmental concerns that shape rural landscapes.

Urban Planning Issues:

Urban areas, on the other hand, grapple with challenges such as rapid urbanization, inadequate housing, traffic congestion, pollution, and social exclusion. Effective urban planning requires holistic approaches that balance economic growth, social equity, and environmental sustainability. Workshop-based methods offer a structured platform for stakeholders to collaborate, exchange ideas, and co-design solutions to complex urban problems.

The comparative and exhaustive table outlining planning issues in urban and rural India:

Planning IssuesUrban IndiaRural India
Population DensityHigh population density leading to congestion,Low population density with scattered settlements,
pressure on infrastructure, and housingbut pockets of high population density in some
shortages.regions.
InfrastructureInadequate infrastructure including roads,Limited access to basic amenities such as
water supply, sanitation, and waste management.clean water, electricity, sanitation, and roads.
HousingInformal settlements, slums, and housingLack of affordable housing, poor quality housing,
shortages leading to overcrowding andand traditional construction methods.
inadequate living conditions.
EmploymentFormal and informal sectors, but high rates ofAgriculture-based livelihoods, seasonal migration
unemployment and underemployment.to cities for employment opportunities.
EconomyDiverse economic activities includingAgriculture-dependent economy with low income
manufacturing, services, and commerce.levels and limited diversification.
EducationAccess to quality education but disparities inLimited access to schools, especially higher
rural-urban divide.education institutions.
HealthcareHealthcare facilities available but disparitiesLimited healthcare infrastructure, lack of
in quality and accessibility, especially intrained medical professionals, and inadequate
rural areas.access to healthcare services.
EnvironmentPollution, degradation of natural resources,Deforestation, soil erosion, water scarcity,
and loss of green spaces.and pollution from agricultural practices.
GovernanceComplex governance structures, bureaucraticLimited access to government services,
hurdles, and corruption.bureaucratic inefficiencies, and corruption.
Social InclusionUrban poverty, social exclusion, and disparitiesMarginalization of marginalized communities,
in access to resources and opportunities.caste-based discrimination, and lack of
social infrastructure.

This table provides a comprehensive overview of the planning issues in both urban and rural India, highlighting the diverse challenges faced by each setting. These issues necessitate tailored planning and policy interventions to address the unique needs and contexts of urban and rural communities.

Workshop-based methods in urban planning often involve charrettes, design thinking sessions, urban labs, and scenario planning exercises. These workshops bring together diverse stakeholders, including residents, businesses, government agencies, and non-profit organizations, to brainstorm innovative strategies and visualize future scenarios for urban development. By fostering cross-sectoral collaboration and creative problem-solving, workshop-based methods facilitate the integration of diverse perspectives into urban planning processes.

Bridging the Gap:

While rural and urban planning issues may differ in scale and scope, there are common principles that underpin effective planning approaches in both contexts. Community engagement, participatory decision-making, and capacity building are key elements that can bridge the gap between rural and urban planning practices.

In rural areas, community-based methods empower local residents to identify their priorities, leverage local resources, and build resilient communities. By fostering a sense of ownership and agency, these methods can help address issues such as poverty alleviation, sustainable agriculture, and natural resource management.

In urban areas, workshop-based methods facilitate collaboration between various stakeholders to address complex urban challenges. By harnessing the collective intelligence of diverse actors, these methods can lead to innovative solutions for improving urban livability, promoting inclusive growth, and enhancing environmental quality.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, addressing rural and urban planning issues requires a nuanced understanding of local contexts, stakeholders, and dynamics. Community-based and workshop-based methods offer complementary approaches to engage residents, foster collaboration, and co-create sustainable solutions. By combining the strengths of these methodologies, planners and policymakers can navigate the complexities of rural and urban landscapes, and work towards building inclusive, resilient, and vibrant communities for the future.

References

Dehalwar, K., & Sharma, S. N. (2023). Fate of Slums of Bhopal-A Tale of Struggle and Resilience. Think India Journal, 26(4), 12-18.

Dehalwar, K., & Singh, J. (2016). Challenges and strategies for the improvement of water management in Bhopal. European Scientific Journal, 12(2).

Levy, J. M., Hirt, S., & Dawkins, C. J. (2009). Contemporary urban planning. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Pinson, D. (2004). Urban planning: an ‘undisciplined’discipline?. Futures, 36(4), 503-513.

Sharma, S. N. (2014). Participatory Planning in Plan Preparation. BookCountry.

Sharma, S. N., & Abhishek, K. (2015). Planning Issue in Roorkee Town. Planning.

Sharma, S. N. (2005). Evaluation of the JnNURM Programme of Government of India for Urban Renewal. Think India Journal, 8(2), 1-7.

Watson, V. (2009). Seeing from the South: Refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central urban issues. Urban studies, 46(11), 2259-2275.

Understanding the Dynamics of Peri-Urban Areas: Navigating the Interface Between Urban and Rural Realms

By Kavita Dehalwar

Peri-urban areas, situated at the fringe of urban centers, represent a unique and dynamic space that embodies the confluence of urban and rural characteristics. These transitional zones are increasingly becoming focal points for researchers, policymakers, and planners due to their distinct challenges and opportunities. This article explores the multifaceted nature of peri-urban areas, shedding light on their defining features, issues, and the implications for sustainable development.

Image Credit: Idczak, P., & Mrozik, K. (2018)

Peri-urban areas, the dynamic spaces straddling the urban and rural realms, have been subjects of extensive research, each contributing valuable insights into their unique challenges and opportunities. The works of Dehalwar et al. (“Fate of Slums of Bhopal-A Tale of Struggle and Resilience”) and Kumar et al. (“Planning and Development of Housing in Urban Fringe Area: Case of Bhopal (M.P.)”) shed light on the struggles and resilience of communities in peri-urban Bhopal, illustrating the complex interplay of social, economic, and environmental factors.

Kombe’s study (“Land use dynamics in peri-urban areas and their implications on the urban growth and form: the case of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania”) delves into land use dynamics, emphasizing their impact on urban growth and form. This work highlights the need for comprehensive planning to address the challenges posed by rapid urbanization on the fringes of cities.

Mortoja et al.’s systematic review (“What is the most suitable methodological approach to demarcate peri-urban areas?”) critically assesses various methodological approaches to demarcate peri-urban areas. Understanding the most suitable demarcation methods is crucial for effective planning and development interventions.

Rauws and de Roo (“Exploring transitions in the peri-urban area”) offer insights into the transitions occurring in peri-urban areas, emphasizing the importance of understanding and managing these changes to ensure sustainable development.

Sharma’s extensive body of work, including “Urban forms in planning and design,” “Sustainable development strategies and approaches,” and “Review of most used urban growth models,” provides a comprehensive understanding of urban development, sustainability, and growth models. Additionally, Sharma et al.’s article in Thematics Journal of Geography (“Redefining Peri-urban Urban Areas”) contributes to the ongoing discourse on peri-urban areas, offering new perspectives and frameworks for understanding and planning these transitional zones.

Lastly, Wandl and Magoni (“Sustainable planning of peri-urban areas: Introduction to the special issue”) underscore the importance of sustainable planning in peri-urban areas. Their work provides a foundational perspective for policymakers and planners aiming to strike a balance between urbanization and environmental conservation in these crucial zones.

Collectively, these studies contribute to a holistic understanding of peri-urban areas, addressing their complexities, challenges, and sustainable development strategies. The interdisciplinary nature of the research reflects the diverse factors at play in these transitional spaces, ultimately guiding policymakers and researchers toward informed and effective interventions.

Defining Peri-Urban Areas:

Peri-urban areas, often referred to as the urban-rural interface, are regions that lie on the outskirts of expanding urban centers. These zones are characterized by a complex interplay of urban and rural elements, encompassing a mix of agricultural, residential, industrial, and recreational land uses. The boundaries between the urban and rural become blurred in peri-urban areas, creating a mosaic of land uses and socio-economic activities.

Features and Challenges:

  1. Land Use Diversity: Peri-urban areas exhibit diverse land uses, ranging from traditional agriculture and rural settlements to industrial zones and suburban developments. This diversity poses challenges in land management, as conflicting interests may arise between agricultural preservation and urban expansion.
  2. Infrastructure and Services: The rapid urbanization of peri-urban areas often outpaces the development of necessary infrastructure and services. Issues such as inadequate transportation, water supply, and sanitation facilities can impede the quality of life for residents.
  3. Environmental Concerns: Balancing the preservation of natural resources with urban growth is a critical concern in peri-urban regions. Deforestation, pollution, and the depletion of water resources are challenges that require sustainable planning and management strategies.
  4. Social Dynamics: Peri-urban areas experience social transformations as migration and urbanization influence local communities. This can lead to issues related to cultural identity, social cohesion, and access to education and healthcare.

Opportunities for Sustainable Development:

  1. Integrated Planning: Adopting integrated planning approaches that consider both urban and rural aspects is essential for sustainable peri-urban development. This involves collaboration between urban and rural planners to create cohesive land use strategies.
  2. Agricultural Innovation: Supporting sustainable agriculture practices in peri-urban areas can enhance food security while preserving rural livelihoods. This may involve promoting agroecology, local markets, and alternative farming methods.
  3. Green Infrastructure: Designing peri-urban areas with green spaces, parks, and sustainable infrastructure not only improves the quality of life but also contributes to environmental conservation.
  4. Community Engagement: Involving local communities in decision-making processes is crucial for addressing the unique challenges of peri-urban areas. Community engagement ensures that development initiatives align with the needs and aspirations of residents.

Conclusion:

Peri-urban areas stand at the crossroads of urbanization and rural life, presenting both challenges and opportunities. Effectively managing these transitional zones requires a holistic and integrated approach that considers the diverse needs of residents, the environment, and the economy. By acknowledging the complexity of peri-urban dynamics, planners and policymakers can work towards fostering sustainable development that respects the unique identity of these areas.

References

Dehalwar, Kavita, and Shashikant Nishant Sharma. “Fate of Slums of Bhopal-A Tale of Struggle and Resilience.” Think India Journal 26.4 (2023): 12-18.

Idczak, P., & Mrozik, K. (2018). Periurbanisation – evidence from Polish metropolitan areas. Economic and Environmental Studies, 18(45), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.25167/ees.2018.45.11

Kombe, Wilbard Jackson. “Land use dynamics in peri-urban areas and their implications on the urban growth and form: the case of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.” Habitat International 29.1 (2005): 113-135.

Kumar, G., Vyas, S., Sharma, S. N., & Dehalwar, K. (2023). Planning and Development of Housing in Urban Fringe Area: Case of Bhopal (M.P.). GIS Business, 18(1), 1–14.

Mortoja, Md Golam, Tan Yigitcanlar, and Severine Mayere. “What is the most suitable methodological approach to demarcate peri-urban areas? A systematic review of the literature.” Land Use Policy 95 (2020): 104601.

Rauws, W. S., and Gert de Roo. “Exploring transitions in the peri-urban area.” Planning Theory & Practice 12.2 (2011): 269-284.

Sharma, Shashikant Nishant. “Urban forms in planning and design.” International Journal of Research 1.1 (2014): 7-16.

Sharma, Shashikant Nishant. “Sustainable development strategies and approaches.” International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR) 2 (2013).

Sharma, Shashikant Nishant. “Review of most used urban growth models.” International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET) 10.3 (2019): 397-405.

Sharma, Shashikant Nishant, Shankar Chatterjee, and Kavita Dehalwar. “Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme: Challenges and Opportunities.” Think India Journal 26.1 (2023): 7-15.

Sharma, Shashikant Nishant, ed. New perspectives in sociology and allied fields. EduPedia Publications (P) Ltd, 2016.

Sharma, Shashikant Nishant, Dehalwar, K., Kumar, G., & Vyas, S. (2023). Redefining Peri-urban Urban Areas. Thematics Journal of Geography, 12(3), 8–13.

Wandl, Alexander, and Marcello Magoni. “Sustainable planning of peri-urban areas: Introduction to the special issue.” Planning Practice & Research 32.1 (2017): 1-3.